Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502 (2009), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court that upheld regulations of the Federal Communications Commission that ban "fleeting expletives" on television broadcasts, finding they were not arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. [1]
The Supreme Court on July 1, 2024, kept on hold efforts by Texas and Florida to limit how Facebook, TikTok, X, YouTube and other social media platforms regulate content in a ruling that strongly ...
Trump’s attorneys contend that evidence used against him at trial should have been shielded by the Supreme Court’s “immunity” decision as part of the protected “official” acts of the ...
Matthew Fox. Updated January 6, 2025 at 7:29 AM. Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg. A recent Supreme Court ruling may slow down President-elect Donald Trump's deregulation plans. ... USA TODAY Sports.
On January 12, 2015, the district court was granted in part. This decision came after Supreme Court decision in American Broadcasting Cos. v. Aereo, Inc., but the district court ruled that Aereo did not overrule the volitional conduct doctrine to hold primary infringement of copyright. The district court expressed that "the volitional conduct ...
Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 567 U.S. 239 (2012), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding whether the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's scheme for regulating speech is unconstitutionally vague.
Supreme Court decision should help reduce executive orders Bill Bright, who has been in the fishing industry for decades, is one of several fishermen fighting a federal regulation at the Supreme ...
Trump's team asked the Supreme Court to reject the expedited timeline and allow the appeals court to consider the case first. [29] [30] On December 22, the Supreme Court denied the special counsel's request, leaving the case to the appeals court. [31] On January 9, 2024, the D.C. Court of Appeals heard arguments in the immunity dispute.