Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A Cabtaxi number is the smallest positive number that can be expressed as a sum of two integer cubes in n ways, allowing the cubes to be negative or zero as well as positive. The smallest cabtaxi number after Cabtaxi(1) = 0, is Cabtaxi(2) = 91, [5] expressed as:
Sum of four cubes problem, whether every integer is a sum of four cubes; Euler's sum of powers conjecture § k = 3, relating to cubes that can be written as a sum of three positive cubes; Plato's number, an ancient text possibly discussing the equation 3 3 + 4 3 + 5 3 = 6 3; Taxicab number, the smallest integer that can be expressed as a sum of ...
The polynomial x 2 + cx + d, where a + b = c and ab = d, can be factorized into (x + a)(x + b).. In mathematics, factorization (or factorisation, see English spelling differences) or factoring consists of writing a number or another mathematical object as a product of several factors, usually smaller or simpler objects of the same kind.
Having a factor of 3 means a number isn’t prime (with the sole exception of 3 itself). And that's why every third odd number can't be prime. ... The Amazing Math Inside the Rubik’s Cube.
1729 can be expressed as a sum of two positive cubes in two ways, illustrated geometrically. 1729 is also known as Ramanujan number or Hardy–Ramanujan number, named after an anecdote of the British mathematician G. H. Hardy when he visited Indian mathematician Srinivasa Ramanujan who was ill in a hospital.
The FOIL rule converts a product of two binomials into a sum of four (or fewer, if like terms are then combined) monomials. [6] The reverse process is called factoring or factorization. In particular, if the proof above is read in reverse it illustrates the technique called factoring by grouping.
The sum of four cubes problem [1] asks whether every integer is the sum of four cubes of integers. It is conjectured the answer is affirmative, but this conjecture has been neither proven nor disproven. [2] Some of the cubes may be negative numbers, in contrast to Waring's problem on sums of cubes, where they are required to be positive.
G(3) is at least 4 (since cubes are congruent to 0, 1 or −1 mod 9); for numbers less than 1.3 × 10 9, 1 290 740 is the last to require 6 cubes, and the number of numbers between N and 2N requiring 5 cubes drops off with increasing N at sufficient speed to have people believe that G(3) = 4; [22] the largest number now known not to be a sum of ...