enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. DeFunis v. Odegaard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeFunis_v._Odegaard

    The case did not constitute "voluntary cessation" on the part of the defendant law school, as the plaintiff was now in his final quarter, and the law school could take no action to deny him the ability to graduate. Also, it was not a question that was "capable of repetition, yet evading review" because the plaintiff would never again face the ...

  3. Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_ex_rel._Gaines_v...

    Canada, 305 U.S. 337 (1938), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that states which provided a school to White students had to provide in-state education to Black students as well. States could satisfy this requirement by allowing Black and White students to attend the same school or creating a second school for Black students. [1]

  4. Bank of New York Mellon v. Realogy Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_of_New_York_Mellon_v...

    Realogy Corporation, 2008 WL 5259732, is a case that was decided in Delaware's Court of Chancery in 2008. [1] The court held that a company's proposed debt exchange offer was not permissible under the terms of the documents governing the company's debt. The case is frequently referenced in banking law and is used in several law school case ...

  5. Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Massachusetts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marrama_v._Citizens_Bank...

    Marrama's argument was that he had an absolute right to convert his case from Chapter 7 to Chapter 13 under the plain language of §706(a) of the Code. [6] Citizens Bank argued that the statute uses the word “may” rather than “shall,” leaving room for the courts, in their discretion, to construe a "bad faith" exception to the general rule.

  6. United Dominions Trust Ltd v Kirkwood - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Dominions_Trust_Ltd...

    United Dominions Trust Ltd v Kirkwood [1966] 2 QB 431 was a decision of the Court of Appeal relating to what constitutes "banking business" as a matter of English law. [1] Ellinger's Modern Banking Law refers to the judgment as a "landmark decision". [2]

  7. Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spokeo,_Inc._v._Robins

    Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 578 U.S. 330 (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court vacated and remanded a ruling by United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on the basis that the Ninth Circuit had not properly determined whether the plaintiff has suffered an "injury-in-fact" when analyzing whether he had standing to bring his case in federal court. [1]

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/College_Savings_Bank_v...

    A companion case to the similarly named (but not to be confused) Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v.College Savings Bank, [2] the court held – in a decision authored by Justice Antonin Scalia – that sovereign immunity precluded a private action brought under the Lanham Act.