Ad
related to: accord and satisfaction settlement formrocketlawyer.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
A+ Rating - Better Business Bureau
- Save With Rocket Legal+
One Membership For Everything Legal
The Membership That Pays For Itself
- Business Formations
Protect Your Assets.
Make Your New Venture Official.
- Save With Rocket Legal+
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Accord and satisfaction is a settlement of an unliquidated debt. For example, a builder is contracted to build a homeowner a garage for $35,000. The contract called for $17,500 prior to starting construction, to disburse $10,000 during various stages of construction, and to make a final payment of $7,500 at completion.
Consideration is the price one pays for another's promise. It can take a number of forms: money, property, a promise, the doing of an act, or even refraining from doing an act. In broad terms, if one agrees to do something he was not otherwise legally obligated to do, it may be said that he has given consideration.
In these circumstances there was no true accord so as to found a defence of accord and satisfaction: see Day v McLea. [7] There is also no equity in the defendant to warrant any departure from the due course of law. No person can insist on a settlement procured by intimidation.
An exception to this rule holds for settlements, such as an accord and satisfaction. If a creditor has a credit against a debtor for $10,000, and offers to settle it for $5,000, it is still binding, if accepted, even though the debtor had a legal duty to repay the entire $10,000.
A third-party beneficiary, in the civil law of contracts, is a person who may have the right to sue on a contract, despite not having originally been an active party to the contract.
Contracts are widely used in commercial law, and for the most part form the legal foundation for transactions across the world. Common examples include contracts for the sale of services and goods, construction contracts , contracts of carriage , software licenses , employment contracts , insurance policies , sales or leases of land, among others.
The case reports the judgment as follows. payment of a lesser sum on the day in satisfaction of a greater, cannot be any satisfaction for the whole, because it appears to the Judges that by no possibility, a lesser sum can be a satisfaction to the plaintiff for a greater sum: but the gift of a horse, hawk, or robe, etc. in satisfaction is good. For it shall be intended that a horse, hawk, or ...
HBF Dalgety then wrote a letter to Mr Morton saying they had not accepted his cheque as full settlement, and demanded he pay the balance of its fee of $7,318.98 ($13,645 in 2011 adjusted for inflation), which Mr Morton subsequently refused to pay, claiming accord and satisfaction.
Ad
related to: accord and satisfaction settlement formrocketlawyer.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
A+ Rating - Better Business Bureau