Ad
related to: us supreme court trademark laws and rulesuslegalforms.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Trademark Act of 1905 imports the rules of practice and procedure that govern appeals of patent applications, and so authorizes a trademark owner to bring a suit in equity following an unsuccessful trademark cancellation appeal; and under the Trademark Act, both parties to a trademark cancellation interference have the right to appeal a ...
Trademark law protects a company's goodwill, and helps consumers easily identify the source of the things they purchase. In principle, trademark law, by preventing others from copying a source-identifying mark, reduces the customer's costs of shopping and making purchasing decisions, for it quickly and easily assures a potential customer that this
Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc. 505 U.S. 763 (1992) (Supreme Court applied trademark distinctiveness spectrum to trade dress, arguably giving official sanction to the merger of the requirements for trademark and trade dress, noting that inherently distinctive trade dress required no showing of secondary meaning.)
Under U.S. Supreme Court precedent, the fair use defense in trademark law is not precluded by the possibility of confusion. [3] However, courts may consider the possibility of confusion in analyzing whether a use is fair or not. [4]
The Supreme Court signaled Wednesday that it would rule against a man who wants to trademark the suggestive phrase “Trump too small.” The dispute is over the government's decision to deny a ...
Inwood Laboratories Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc., 456 U.S. 844 (1982), is a United States Supreme Court case, in which the Court confirmed the application of and set out a test for contributory trademark liability under § 32 of the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § 1114). [1] [2]
Vidal v. Elster, 602 U.S. 286, is a United States Supreme Court case dealing with 15 U.S.C. § 1052, a provision of the Lanham Act regarding trademarks using the name of living individuals without their consent. The court decided that the provision does not violate the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. [1] [2]
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Supreme Court justices on Wednesday appeared skeptical that a California lawyer can own a federal trademark covering the phrase "Trump Too Small" over the objections of ...
Ad
related to: us supreme court trademark laws and rulesuslegalforms.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month