Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The grammar of the Sanskrit language has a complex verbal system, rich nominal declension, and extensive use of compound nouns.It was studied and codified by Sanskrit grammarians from the later Vedic period (roughly 8th century BCE), culminating in the Pāṇinian grammar of the 4th century BCE.
Pages in category "Ancient Sanskrit grammarians" The following 10 pages are in this category, out of 10 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. B.
Shakatayana (Śākaṭāyana; 814–760 BCE) [1] was a Sanskrit grammarian, linguist, and Vedic scholar. [2] [3] He is known for his theory that all nouns are derived from a verbal root which contrasted to grammarian Pāṇini. He also posited that prepositions only have a meaning when attached to nouns or other words.
In line with many Sanskrit grammarians who had incorporated Panini's Vedic sutras to understand classical Vedic mantras. Bhoja asserts anyone who aspires to learn Sanskrit grammar , has to query everything from the sutra's alone and not to search in different texts. [ 4 ]
He mastered Sanskrit grammar before the age of twenty, passing various examinations from Bengal, Baroda and Pune. [2] He began teaching at the Poona Sanskrit College and served as its principal from 1947 to 1955. [2] Joshi was the teacher to Daniel Ingalls in 1950s.
Pages in category "Sanskrit grammarians" The following 34 pages are in this category, out of 34 total. This list may not reflect recent changes. * Vyākaraṇa; A.
In the 14th century grammarian Padmanabhadatta, founder of the Supadma School, composed the Supadmavyākaraṇa. [45] The text is based on Pāṇini's Ashtadhyayi, but remodeled and rearranged with explanatory notes. It is written in Bengali alphabet, making it accessible to the Bengal provinces by removing the complexity of Sanskrit grammar. [46]
The Altindische Grammatik is the monumental Sanskrit grammar by Jacob Wackernagel (1853–1938), after his death continued by Albert Debrunner, published in Göttingen between 1896 and 1957. The work presents a full discussion of Sanskrit phonology and nominal morphology, but a treatment of the verb is lacking.