Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
0 < √ D − n < 1. If the square root of D is rational, then it can be written as the irreducible fraction p/q, so that q is the smallest possible denominator, and hence the smallest number for which q √ D is also an integer. Then: (√ D − n)q √ D = qD − nq √ D. which is thus also an integer. But 0 < (√ D − n) < 1 so (√ D − ...
In mathematics, "rational" is often used as a noun abbreviating "rational number". The adjective rational sometimes means that the coefficients are rational numbers. For example, a rational point is a point with rational coordinates (i.e., a point whose coordinates are rational numbers); a rational matrix is a matrix of rational numbers; a rational polynomial may be a polynomial with rational ...
The integers arranged on a number line. An integer is the number zero , a positive natural number (1, 2, 3, . . .), or the negation of a positive natural number (−1, −2, −3, . . .). [1] The negations or additive inverses of the positive natural numbers are referred to as negative integers. [2]
In particular √ D belongs to [], being a root of the equation x 2 − D = 0, which has 4D as its discriminant. The square root of any integer is a quadratic integer, as every integer can be written n = m 2 D, where D is a square-free integer, and its square root is a root of x 2 − m 2 D = 0.
The name algebraic integer comes from the fact that the only rational numbers that are algebraic integers are the integers, and because the algebraic integers in any number field are in many ways analogous to the integers. If K is a number field, its ring of integers is the subring of algebraic integers in K, and is frequently denoted as O K.
[1] Number theorists study prime numbers as well as the properties of mathematical objects constructed from integers (for example, rational numbers), or defined as generalizations of the integers (for example, algebraic integers). Integers can be considered either in themselves or as solutions to equations (Diophantine geometry).
The only assumption we made was that log 2 3 is rational (and so expressible as a quotient of integers m/n with n ≠ 0). The contradiction means that this assumption must be false, i.e. log 2 3 is irrational, and can never be expressed as a quotient of integers m / n with n ≠ 0.
A sequence obeying the order-d equation also obeys all higher order equations. These identities may be proved in a number of ways, including via the theory of finite differences . [ 9 ] Any sequence of d + 1 {\displaystyle d+1} integer, real, or complex values can be used as initial conditions for a constant-recursive sequence of order d + 1 ...