Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The 1998 Internet Tax Freedom Act is a United States law authored by Representative Christopher Cox and Senator Ron Wyden that established national policy regarding federal and state taxation of the internet, based upon its unique characteristics as a mode of interstate and global commerce uniquely susceptible to multiple and discriminatory ...
Internet tax is a tax on Internet-based services. A number of jurisdictions have introduced an Internet tax and others are considering doing so mainly as a result of successful tax avoidance by multinational corporations that operate within the digital economy . [ 1 ]
The bill would end a grandfather clause in the original Internet Tax Freedom Act that allowed states and localities to keep charging an internet sales tax if they had already been doing so in 1998. [ 4 ] [ 3 ] This bill would end that grandfather clause, resulting in a handful of states losing about $500 million a year in combined taxes. [ 4 ]
States collect income tax to pay for services such as education, medical care and public infrastructure. A large part of each state’s revenue comes from personal income tax as well as sales tax...
Revenue from tourism allows the state to operate with no state income tax, but Floridians – and visitors – pay a higher-than-average sales tax rate of 6%. 3. Nevada
The Internet Tax Freedom Act merely prevents states from imposing their sales tax, or any other kind of gross receipts tax, on certain online services. For example, a state may impose an income or franchise tax on the net income earned by the provider of online services, while the same state would be precluded from imposing its sales tax on the ...
The Marketplace Fairness Act, perhaps known better as the Internet sales tax bill, is creating quite the uproar in Congress and among the public. The bill, which is designed to allow states and ...
Another possible federal limitation on Internet taxation is the United States Supreme Court case, Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), [16] which held that under the dormant commerce clause, goods purchased through mail order cannot be subject to a state's sales tax unless the vendor has a substantial nexus with the state levying ...