Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A Trump judge just declared 'qui tam' anti-fraud lawsuits unconstitutional. They've been around since 1863. Column: A Trump judge just overturned the government's most effective anti-fraud tool ...
Donald Trump’s company was fined $1.6 million Friday as punishment for a scheme in which the former president’s top executives dodged personal income taxes on lavish job perks — a symbolic ...
The employment tax fraud count is punishable by a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a $250,000 fine, or twice the gross gain or loss from the offense, whichever is greatest.
The historical antecedents of qui tam statutes lie in Roman and Anglo-Saxon law. [3] Roman criminal prosecutions were typically initiated by private citizens and beginning no later than the Lex Pedia, it became common for Roman criminal statutes to offer a portion of the defendant's forfeited property to the initiator of the prosecution as a reward. [3]
Trump spoke to media before going into court but remained silent in both the morning and lunch breaks leaving attorney Alina Habba to speak on his behalf
New York v. Trump is a civil investigation and lawsuit by the office of the New York Attorney General (AG) alleging that individuals and business entities within the Trump Organization engaged in financial fraud by presenting vastly disparate property values to potential lenders and tax officials, in violation of New York Executive Law § 63(12).
Watch live as Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial continues in New York on Wednesday 4 October. Lawyers in the former US president’s business fraud trial will go through years of his financial ...
The first qui tam case under the amended False Claims Act was filed in 1987 by an eye surgeon against an eye clinic and one of its doctors, alleging unnecessary surgeries and other procedures were being performed. [18] The case settled in 1988 for a total of $605,000. However, the law was primarily used in the beginning against defense contractors.