enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. History of the creation–evolution controversy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_creation...

    Rejection of evolution by religious groups, sometimes called creation–evolution controversy, has a long history. [1] In response to theories developed by scientists, some religious individuals and organizations question the legitimacy of scientific ideas that contradicted the young earth pseudoscientific interpretation of the creation account in Genesis.

  3. Rejection of evolution by religious groups - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rejection_of_evolution_by...

    Recurring cultural, political, and theological rejection of evolution by religious groups [a] exists regarding the origins of the Earth, of humanity, and of other life. In accordance with creationism, species were once widely believed to be fixed products of divine creation, but since the mid-19th century, evolution by natural selection has been established by the scientific community as an ...

  4. Acceptance of evolution by religious groups - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceptance_of_evolution_by...

    Theistic evolutionists argue that it is inappropriate to use Genesis as a scientific text, since it was written in a pre-scientific age and originally intended for religious instruction; as such, seemingly chronological aspects of the creation accounts should be thought of in terms of a literary framework. Theistic evolutionists may believe ...

  5. Theistic evolution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theistic_evolution

    Others see "evolutionary creation" [18] (EC, also referred to by some observers as "evolutionary creationism") as the belief that God, as Creator, uses evolution to bring about his plan. Eugenie Scott states in Evolution Vs. Creationism that it is a type of evolution rather than creationism, despite its name. "From a scientific point of view ...

  6. Level of support for evolution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support_for_evolution

    It is intended to be a "tongue-in-cheek parody" of the lists of alleged "scientists" supposedly supporting creationist principles that creationist organizations produce. [ 53 ] [ 54 ] The petition demonstrates that there are more scientists who accept evolution with a name like "Steve" alone (over 1370 [ 55 ] ) than there are in total who ...

  7. Creationism by country - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creationism_by_country

    On May 29, 2010, it was announced that creationism and intelligent design will be discussed in history classes as part of the new national curriculum. It will be placed in the subject of ancient history, under the topic of "controversies." [25] Ian Plimer, an anti-creationist geologist, reported being attacked by creationists. [26]

  8. Outline of the creation–evolution controversy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_the_creation...

    Creationism, and more specifically: Creation science, Intelligent design, Neo-Creationism, Old Earth and Young Earth creationism; Evolution, and more specifically: Natural selection, Common descent, Origins of life, Age of the Earth/Universe; Intelligent design; Objections to evolution

  9. Category:Creationists - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Creationists

    Those holding that species had been created separately (such as Philip Gosse in 1857) were generally called "advocates of creation" but were also called "creationists," as in private correspondence between Charles Darwin and his friends. As the creation–evolution controversy developed over time, the term "anti-evolutionists" became common.