Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The set of all context-free languages is identical to the set of languages accepted by pushdown automata, which makes these languages amenable to parsing.Further, for a given CFG, there is a direct way to produce a pushdown automaton for the grammar (and thereby the corresponding language), though going the other way (producing a grammar given an automaton) is not as direct.
An extended context-free grammar (or regular right part grammar) is one in which the right-hand side of the production rules is allowed to be a regular expression over the grammar's terminals and nonterminals. Extended context-free grammars describe exactly the context-free languages. [36]
All regular languages are linear; conversely, an example of a linear, non-regular language is { a n b n}. as explained above.All linear languages are context-free; conversely, an example of a context-free, non-linear language is the Dyck language of well-balanced bracket pairs.
The general idea of a hierarchy of grammars was first described by Noam Chomsky in "Three models for the description of language". [1] Marcel-Paul Schützenberger also played a role in the development of the theory of formal languages; the paper "The algebraic theory of context free languages" [2] describes the modern hierarchy, including context-free grammars.
Deterministic context-free languages can be recognized by a deterministic Turing machine in polynomial time and O(log 2 n) space; as a corollary, DCFL is a subset of the complexity class SC. [3] The set of deterministic context-free languages is closed under the following operations: [4] complement; inverse homomorphism; right quotient with a ...
A language L over the alphabet is context-free if and only if there exists . a matched alphabet ¯; a regular language over ¯,; and a homomorphism : (¯); such that = ().. We can interpret this as saying that any CFG language can be generated by first generating a typed Dyck language, filtering it by a regular grammar, and finally converting each bracket into a word in the CFG language.
The difference between these types is that they have increasingly strict production rules and can therefore express fewer formal languages. Two important types are context-free grammars (Type 2) and regular grammars (Type 3). The languages that can be described with such a grammar are called context-free languages and regular languages ...
Ogden's lemma is often stated in the following form, which can be obtained by "forgetting about" the grammar, and concentrating on the language itself: If a language L is context-free, then there exists some number (where p may or may not be a pumping length) such that for any string s of length at least p in L and every way of "marking" p or more of the positions in s, s can be written as