enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ohio Supreme Court cites grammar rules, overturns Stark ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/ohio-supreme-court-cites-grammar...

    The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that the Stark County Board of Elections could only discuss in executive session the purchase of voting machines if "premature disclosure" of the information ...

  3. Issue 1: Ohio Supreme Court orders minor changes to ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/issue-1-ohio-supreme-court-233331252...

    In a 4-3 decision on Monday, the Ohio Supreme Court ordered the Ohio Ballot Board to make some changes, but most of the GOP-written ballot language will remain. The panel must reconvene to fix two ...

  4. COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that residents delivering ballots on behalf of voters with disabilities cannot use drop boxes but instead must go inside the county board ...

  5. August 2023 Ohio Issue 1 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/August_2023_Ohio_Issue_1

    The next month, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled on the matter, agreeing with the first two arguments, but not the latter two, and mandating the ballot be rewritten by the state's Ballot Board. [41] The Board did so shortly afterwards and the new, final language was officially certified on May 18th. [42]

  6. Ohio Issue 1: What is it, who is for it, and who is ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/ohio-issue-1-against-035900672.html

    Oct. 15—OHIO — As Ohioans head to the polls this election season, a topic of discussion is Issue 1, a proposed constitutional amendment to overhaul the state's redistricting process. Both ...

  7. McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McIntyre_v._Ohio_Elections...

    The Ohio Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals, also by a divided vote. The majority of the state supreme court justices felt that the Ohio statute was different from the city ordinance in Talley, finding that section 3599.09(A) "has as its purpose the identification of persons who distribute materials containing false statements". [16]

  8. Anderson v. Celebrezze - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anderson_v._Celebrezze

    But the Constitution does not require that a State allow any particular Presidential candidate to be on its ballot, and so long as the Ohio ballot access laws are rational and allow nonparty candidates reasonable access to the general election ballot, this Court should not interfere with Ohio's exercise of its Art. II, 1, cl. 2, power.

  9. Ohio Supreme Court upholds state's new ballot drop box rules

    www.aol.com/news/ohio-supreme-court-upholds...

    Oct. 24—The Center Square The Ohio Supreme Court on Tuesday sided with Secretary of State Frank LaRose and upheld new directives for ballot drop boxes across the state. In a 4-3 ruling, the ...