Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Property is generally deemed to have been lost if it is found in a place where the true owner likely did not intend to set it down and where it is not likely to be found by the true owner. At common law, the finder of a lost item could claim the right to possess the item against any person except the true owner or any previous possessors. [3 ...
R. v. Glyde (1868) 11 Cox C. C. 103 (sovereign found in high road) R. v. Deavis (1869) 11 Cox C. C. 227 (prisoner's child found six sovereigns in public place) An issue may arise when a person takes possession of lost property with the intention of returning it to the owner after inquiry but later converts the property to the finder's use.
In Japan, the lost-and-found property system dates to a code written in the year 718. [1] The first modern lost and found office was organized in Paris in 1805. Napoleon ordered his prefect of police to establish it as a central place "to collect all objects found in the streets of Paris", according to Jean-Michel Ingrandt, who was appointed the office's director in 2001. [2]
Johnnie Jefferson, an 85-year-old resident of Richmond, Texas, says she faces the heartbreaking prospect of losing the six-bedroom house she has lived in for more than 20 years after a ...
%PDF-1.4 %âãÏÓ 6 0 obj > endobj xref 6 120 0000000016 00000 n 0000003048 00000 n 0000003161 00000 n 0000003893 00000 n 0000004342 00000 n 0000004557 00000 n 0000004733 00000 n 0000005165 00000 n 0000005587 00000 n 0000005635 00000 n 0000006853 00000 n 0000007332 00000 n 0000008190 00000 n 0000008584 00000 n 0000009570 00000 n 0000010489 00000 n 0000011402 00000 n 0000011640 00000 n ...
The area has been a hotspot for unaccompanied migrant kids. Just a few days ago, Texas authorities found a 2-year-old girl from El Salvador who crossed with 60 other unaccompanied children. The ...
In 1883, he entered into the practice of law in Tennessee and was from 1889 to 1891 a member of the Tennessee House of Representatives. He relocated in 1897 to Ardmore in the southern Oklahoma Territory , where he farmed [ 4 ] and handled leases for the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma , but lost all of his assets in the Panic of 1907 .
Pearson v. Chung, also known as the "$54 million pants" case, is a 2007 civil case decided in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in which Roy Pearson, then an administrative law judge, sued his local dry cleaning establishment for $54 million in damages after the dry cleaners allegedly lost his pants.