Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Forty-first Amendment of the Constitution (Agreement on a Unified Patent Court) Bill 2024 (bill no. 7 of 2024) is a proposed amendment to the Constitution of Ireland to allow the state to ratify the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court. The Agreement on the Unified Patent Court was signed in 2013 by Ireland and 25 EU member states.
The Forty-first Amendment of the Constitution (Agreement on a Unified Patent Court) Bill 2024 was published on 15 February 2024. In April 2024 the government announced that the referendum was postponed, and would not take place in June. [194] Netherlands. In the Netherlands, European patents apply to the whole Kingdom, except for Aruba. The ...
This is a list of decisions and opinions of the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) in chronological order of their date of issuance. The list includes decisions under Article 112(1)(a) EPC (following a referral from a Board of Appeal), opinions under Article 112(1)(b) EPC (following a referral from the President of the EPO), "to ensure uniform application of the law ...
An Act to restate the law of copyright, with amendments; to make fresh provision as to the rights of performers and others in performances; to confer a design right in original designs; to amend the Registered Designs Act 1949; to make provision with respect to patent agents and trade mark agents; to confer patents and designs jurisdiction on ...
This category combines all articles containing potentially dated statements from May 2024 (2024-05) to enable us to work through the backlog more systematically. It is a member of Category:Articles containing potentially dated statements. Articles in this category contain statements that may become dated originating from May 2024. The ...
The discharge petition put forth by House Representatives, Garret Graves and Abigail Spanberger, on September 10, 2024 has now hit the required 218 signatures needed to force a vote, but whether ...
Amendments included adding clarifications, and removing the creation of a "Frontier Model Division" and the penalty of perjury. [35] [36] On August 28, the bill passed the State Assembly 48-16. Then, due to the amendments, the bill was once again voted on by the Senate, passing 30-9. [37] [38] On September 29, Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed the ...
If a patent or trademark registration is applied for during the temporary period of protection, the priority date of the application may be counted "from the date of introduction of the goods into the exhibition" rather than from the date of filing of the application, if the temporary protection referred to in Article 11(1) has been implemented ...