enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Termination for convenience - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Termination_for_convenience

    A termination for convenience clause, or "T for C" clause, [1] enables a party to a contract to bring the contract to an end without the need to establish that the other party is in default, for example because the client party's needs have changed, or in order to arrange for another party to complete the contract. [2]

  3. G. L. Christian and Associates v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._L._Christian_and...

    Under this clause, the contractor could claim a profit allowance for work it already had performed, but not for anticipated profits. However, the company argued that because the Army had failed to include this termination for convenience clause in the contract, the Army's cancellation of the project constituted a breach of contract .

  4. Federal Acquisition Regulation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Acquisition_Regulation

    The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) is the principal set of rules regarding Government procurement in the United States, [1] and is codified at Chapter 1 of Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 48 CFR 1. It covers many of the contracts issued by the US military and NASA, as well as US civilian federal agencies.

  5. Government procurement in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_procurement_in...

    requests for equitable adjustments, which can be processed under FAR 49.002(c)) (these are essentially modifications under the applicable contract changes clause e.g., FAR 52.212-4 clause) terminations for cause or convenience; for commercial items, there are terminations clause in the FAR 52.212-4 clause.

  6. Wickard v. Filburn - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn

    Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 (1942), was a landmark United States Supreme Court decision that dramatically increased the regulatory power of the federal government. It remains as one of the most important and far-reaching cases concerning the New Deal, and it set a precedent for an expansive reading of the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause for decades to come.

  7. United States contract law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_contract_law

    The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Company, forum selection clauses; Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge, on the Constitution's Contract Clause; Marquez v. Screen Actors Guild Inc., on the validity of union shop contracts; Salazar v. Ramah Navajo Chapter, 567 U.S. ___ (2012) the US government's obligation to honor contracts with Native Americans.

  8. What Is the Convenience of the Employer Rule? - AOL

    www.aol.com/convenience-employer-rule-141303148.html

    There are some cases where employees can escape double taxation. The main way is to pass the convenience of the employer (COE) test, which signifies their home office is a bona fide employer office.

  9. Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_River_Bridge_v...

    Case history; Prior: None: Subsequent: None: Holding; That the Massachusetts state legislature's decision to grant a charter to the proprietors of Warren Bridge after granting a similar charter to the Charles River Bridge Company did not constitute a violation of the Contract Clause. Court membership; Chief Justice Roger B. Taney Associate Justices