Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The FTC filed a complaint that the Texas-based company Applied Food Sciences (the promoters of the study) had falsely advertised. The FTC alleged that the study was "so hopelessly flawed that no reliable conclusions could be drawn from it" so Applied Food Sciences agreed to pay a $3.5 million settlement.
[1] [2] It was formed in 1984, primarily to publish peer-reviewed medical journals. As of 2016, Pulsus published 98 hybrid and full open-access journals, 15 of which had been adopted as the official publications of related medical societies. [3] Pulsus Group also conducts conferences in association with scientific societies. [4] [5]
Zillions, originally titled Penny Power, was a children's magazine published by the Consumers Union, the publisher of Consumer Reports. [1] Founded in 1980, at its peak, the magazine covered close to 350,000 subscribers.
The company's business-facing division provides SaaS that allows brands to manage and analyze review data to improve their products and customer service. [6] [7] ConsumerAffairs was founded in 1998 by Jim Hood. [8] The company has been headquartered in Tulsa, Oklahoma since 2010 and also has offices in Austin, Texas, the Philippines, and ...
Journal of Medical Biochemistry: Biochemistry: Walter de Gruyter: English: 1982–present Journal of Medical Biography: Medical Personnel: SAGE Publishing: English: 1993–present Journal of Medical Case Reports: Medicine: BioMed Central: English: 2007–present Journal of Medical Economics: Medicine: Taylor and Francis Group: English: 1998 ...
Several of these groups —Texans for Fiscal Responsibility, Texas Gun Rights, and the Texas Family Project — have been flooding voters with mailers and text messages in the lead-up to the 2024 ...
Consumer Reports (CR), formerly Consumers Union (CU), is an American nonprofit consumer organization dedicated to independent product testing, investigative journalism, consumer-oriented research, public education, and consumer advocacy.
The journal gives unrealistic promises regarding the speed of the peer review process (hinting that the journal's peer review process is minimal or non-existent)—or boasts an equally unrealistic track-record; The journal does not describe copyright agreements clearly or demands the copyright of the paper while claiming to be an open-access ...