enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. DeRolph v. State - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeRolph_v._State

    DeRolph v. State is a landmark case in Ohio constitutional law in which the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled that the state's method for funding public education was unconstitutional. [1] On March 24, 1997, the Supreme Court of Ohio ruled in a 4–3 decision that the state funding system "fails to provide for a thorough and efficient system of ...

  3. Husted v. Randolph Institute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Husted_v._Randolph_Institute

    Husted v. A. Philip Randolph Institute, No. 16-980, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a case before the Supreme Court of the United States regarding Ohio's voter registration laws. [1] At issue was whether federal law, 52 U.S.C. § 20507, [2] permits Ohio's list-maintenance process, which uses a registered voter's voter inactivity as a reason to send a ...

  4. Ohio Courts of Common Pleas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_Courts_of_Common_Pleas

    They are the only trial courts created by the Ohio Constitution (in Article IV, Section 1). The duties of the courts are outlined in Article IV, Section 4. Each of Ohio's 88 counties has a court of common pleas. The Ohio General Assembly (the state legislature) has the power to divide courts of common pleas into divisions, and has done so ...

  5. Legal aid - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_aid

    Legal aid is the provision of assistance to people who are unable to afford legal representation and access to the court system. Legal aid is regarded as central in providing access to justice by ensuring equality before the law, the right to counsel and the right to a fair trial. This article describes the development of legal aid and its ...

  6. Moore v. City of East Cleveland - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore_v._City_of_East...

    Laws applied. U.S. Const. amend. XIV. Moore v. City of East Cleveland, 431 U.S. 494 (1977), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that an East Cleveland, Ohio zoning ordinance that prohibited Inez Moore, a black grandmother, from living with her grandchild was unconstitutional. Writing for a plurality of the Court ...

  7. Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

    Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action".

  8. Gibson's Bakery v. Oberlin College - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibson's_Bakery_v._Oberlin...

    Gibson's Bakery is a fifth-generation family business established in Oberlin, Ohio, in 1885. [5][6] Half of the city's 8,000 residents are students or employees—3,000 and 1,000 respectively—of Oberlin College. [7] Local merchants are reportedly frequent targets of shoplifting by students of the school. [8][9] According to police records ...

  9. Davis v. United States (1994) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States_(1994)

    Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court established that the right to counsel can only be legally asserted by an "unambiguous or unequivocal request for counsel." [1] Legal scholars have criticized this case stating that the "bright line" rule established under Edwards v.