enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. citations - How can I export my Google Scholar Library as a...

    academia.stackexchange.com/questions/24493

    I couldn't find a way to export all citations from My Library (it seems to only work one page at a time), but it's possible to save all citations from the edit mode of My Citations: Log in to https://scholar.google.ca; Click My Citations; Click the leftmost checkbox on the bar at the top of the list of citations:

  3. Another option is to use the Publish or Perish software (which functions as a front-end to Google scholar), which allows you to use the "Lookup citations" feature to get an exportable list of all the citing papers found through Google Scholar. This list will contain year, title, authors, citation count etc for all the citing papers.

  4. Which google scholar citation format is IEEE standard?

    academia.stackexchange.com/questions/76939

    None of the "standard" citations that they provide is IEEE format. Instead, you should use one of the links at the bottom to take the format for your preferred citation manager, such as BibTeX, which can then be used to format following any publication venue's guidelines.

  5. How to quickly get complete list of citations to all my papers?

    academia.stackexchange.com/questions/8134

    It is a Windows application, which allows you to specify queries and then goes to Google Scholar to retrieve and sort the references, citations, etc. Besides computing h-index and a host of other bibliometric indices, it allows you to produce reports from your searches and this is what you seem to be after.

  6. citations - In Google Scholar, is it possible to view the list of...

    academia.stackexchange.com/questions/83582/in-google...

    As you mentioned, unfortunately, Google Scholar only provides the list of publications that cite a given reference. However, if you have access to Web of Science , to look up a list of references cited in a given publication, you can use the Cited References tool.

  7. Edit: the article in question went for over six months after being published (in a well-regarded Springer journal with its own Wikipedia page) without appearing on Google Scholar, until it received a citation, at which point it was added to Google Scholar almost immediately. One more motivation to write papers that get cited.

  8. google scholar - How to count non-self citations of articles ...

    academia.stackexchange.com/questions/160038/how-to-count...

    In Google Scholar, I can view the number of citations of each article, but this includes self-citations. Is there a way to view the number of non-self citations? In this tweet from 2019, the author suggests a way to calculate this number for a specific article. But is there a way to do this automatically for all my articles?

  9. publications - Why do citation counts differ between Google...

    academia.stackexchange.com/questions/173333/why-do...

    I'm using both Semantic Scholar and Google Scholar to keep track of citations to some of my papers. For some papers, I notice that citation counts across these two sites don't match. So, some papers that cite the paper X appear only on Semantic Scholar, or Google Scholar but not on both. What causes this discrepancy?

  10. How can I validate a citation that is genuine in google scholar...

    academia.stackexchange.com/questions/125380/how-can-i...

    Google Scholar may mark citation counts with an asterisk (*), meaning: This "Cited by" count includes citations to the following articles in Scholar. The ones marked * may be different from the article in the profile. How can I validate citations in my Google Scholar account that are genuine but are marked with a *?

  11. How does Google Scholar handle pre-print citations?

    academia.stackexchange.com/questions/211111/how-does...

    Citations for either of the papers will then count towards the "master" manuscript. It does not matter for your citation count if people cite the preprint or the final paper (although of course the latter is the proper way to do it, and other people - most importantly reviewers or journal copy editors - are likely to insist on it).