Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, 536 U.S. 639 (2002), was a 5–4 decision of the United States Supreme Court that upheld an Ohio program that used school vouchers.The Court decided that the program did not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, as long as parents using the program were allowed to choose among a range of secular and religious schools.
Lemon law protection arises under state law, with every U.S. state and the District of Columbia having its own lemon law. [1] Although the exact criteria vary by state, new vehicle lemon laws require that an auto manufacturer repurchase a vehicle that has a significant defect that the manufacturer is unable to repair within a reasonable amount of time. [2]
Steve Lehto is an American attorney, [1] professor, [2] [3] author and YouTuber, known for consumer protection and lemon law litigation in Michigan. [4] Steve has taught at the University of Detroit Mercy as an adjunct professor.
Man paid $10,000 to have teen accuser killed in sexual battery case, Florida cops say Doctor planned to have his girlfriend killed by hiring hitman over dark web, feds say Man hires hitman to kill ...
Reckitt & Colman Ltd v Borden Inc 1 All ER 873, – also known as the Jif Lemon case – is a leading decision of the House of Lords on the tort of passing off. The Court reaffirmed the three part test (reputation and goodwill, misrepresentation, and damage) in order to establish a claim of passing off. Background per Slade LJ: Reckitt, sold lemon juice under the name "Jif Lemon" which came in ...
Sean "Diddy" Combs poses with the Global Icon Award at the 2023 MTV Video Music Awards at the Prudential Center in Newark, New Jersey, on Sept. 12, 2023.
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. Hialeah, 508 U.S. 520 (1993), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an ordinance passed in Hialeah, Florida, forbidding the unnecessary killing of "an animal in a public or private ritual or ceremony not for the primary purpose of food consumption", was unconstitutional.
In 2011, Karen had to recuse herself from the Manhattan DA’s case against Dominique Strauss-Kahn when the former head of the International Monetary Fund hired the law firm where Marc worked.