Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians of the Bishop Community, 538 U.S. 701 (2003) South Florida Water Management Dist. v. Miccosukee Tribe, 541 U.S. 95 (2004) United States v. Lara, 541 U.S. 193 (2004) Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma v. Leavitt, 543 U.S. 631 (2005) City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York, 544 U.S. 197 (2005) Wagnon v.
Solem v. Bartlett, 465 U.S. 463 (1984), was a United States Supreme Court case involving Indian country jurisdiction in the United States that decided that opening up reservation lands for settlement by non-Indians does not constitute the intent to diminish reservation boundaries.
A small part of the main reserve extends eastward into Haywood County. The total land area of these parts is 213.934 km 2 (82.600 sq mi), with a 2000 census resident population of 8,092 persons. [6] The Qualla Boundary is not a reservation but rather a land trust supervised by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. The land is a fragment of the ...
Atlantic City's casinos have no legal obligation to stop compulsive gamblers from betting, a judge ruled, dismissing a lawsuit from a self-described problem gambler who accused the Borgata and its ...
The trust lands include many smaller non-contiguous sections to the southwest in Marble, Hiwassee, and Hanging Dog areas of Cherokee County, and the Snowbird community in Graham County. The total land area of these regions is 213.934 km 2 (82.6 sq mi), with a 2000 census resident population of 8,092 people.
Discover the best free online games at AOL.com - Play board, card, casino, puzzle and many more online games while chatting with others in real-time.
Baker, who represents part of Luzerne County, said in a prepared statement. “It is truly disheartening to see a national leader on criminal justice issues for decades so wantonly undermine the ...
The act called for the purchase of all remaining tribal lands and reservations, dissolved the tribe, and ended all law's conferring special legal status on Narragansetts. [32] The opinion briefly considers the mentions of Indians in the Articles of Confederation and United States Constitution and finds no obstacle to the 1880 act in those texts ...