Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wickman alleged that Schuler AG wrongfully terminated their contract for Wickman to visit car makers to market Schuler's panel presses, as their sole representative for four-and-a-half years, even though Wickman had failed to make visits. Clause 7(b) said, ‘It shall be a condition of this agreement that [Wickman] shall send its ...
L. L Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd; N. Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Comrs; R. R v Quick; S. Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
Rainy Sky SA and others v Kookmin Bank [1] is an English contract law case concerning interpretation of contracts. The Supreme Court confirmed the principle laid down in Wickman v Schuler that, if the words of a contract have ambiguous meanings, the court will interpret it in a manner that most accords with "business common sense".
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more
L. L Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd; Lawrence v Metropolitan Police Commissioner; LB (Plastics) Ltd v Swish Products Ltd; Learoyd v Whiteley; Lennard's Carrying Co Ltd v Asiatic Petroleum Co Ltd; Lewisham LBC v Malcolm; Linden Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd; Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd; List of trials of peers in ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more
Judicial observations such as those of Lord Reid in Wickman Machine Tools Sales Ltd v L Schuler AG [1974] AC 235, 251 and Lord Diplock in Antaios Cia Naviera SA v Salen Rederierna AB (The Antaios) [1985] AC 191, 201, quoted by Lord Carnwath at para 110, have to be read and applied bearing that important point in mind. 20.