Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wickman alleged that Schuler AG wrongfully terminated their contract for Wickman to visit car makers to market Schuler's panel presses, as their sole representative for four-and-a-half years, even though Wickman had failed to make visits. Clause 7(b) said, ‘It shall be a condition of this agreement that [Wickman] shall send its ...
Rainy Sky SA and others v Kookmin Bank [1] is an English contract law case concerning interpretation of contracts.The Supreme Court confirmed the principle laid down in Wickman v Schuler that, if the words of a contract have ambiguous meanings, the court will interpret it in a manner that most accords with "business common sense".
L. L Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd; N. Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Comrs; R. R v Quick; S. Spartan Steel & Alloys Ltd v Martin & Co ...
In Bremer Handelsgesellschaft Schaft m.b.h. v Vanden Avenne Izegem p.v.b.a. [1978] 2 Lloyd's Rep 109 at p. 113 Lord Wilberforce spoke of the consequences of a breach of an "innominate term" hinged on the "nature and gravity" of the breach. Since Bunge v Tradax [2] in the House of Lords, the description "innominate term" has been in regular use ...
L. L Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd; Lawrence v Metropolitan Police Commissioner; LB (Plastics) Ltd v Swish Products Ltd; Learoyd v Whiteley; Lennard's Carrying Co Ltd v Asiatic Petroleum Co Ltd; Lewisham LBC v Malcolm; Linden Gardens Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd; Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd; List of trials of peers in ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more
Maredelanto Compania Naviera SA v Bergbau-Handel GmbH [1971] 1 QB 164; Bunge Corporation v Tradax SA [1981] 2 All ER 513; L Schuler AG v Wickman Machine Tool Sales Ltd [1974] AC 235; Golden Strait Corporation v Nippon Yusen Kubishka Kaisha [2007] UKHL 12; Jackson v Union Marine Insurance Co Ltd (1874) LR 10 CP 125
Judicial observations such as those of Lord Reid in Wickman Machine Tools Sales Ltd v L Schuler AG [1974] AC 235, 251 and Lord Diplock in Antaios Cia Naviera SA v Salen Rederierna AB (The Antaios) [1985] AC 191, 201, quoted by Lord Carnwath at para 110, have to be read and applied bearing that important point in mind. 20.