Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The skip list is a linked list augmented with layers of pointers for quickly jumping over large numbers of elements, and then descending to the next layer. This process continues down to the bottom layer, which is the actual list. A binary tree can be seen as a type of linked list where the elements are themselves linked lists of the same ...
A non-blocking linked list is an example of non-blocking data structures designed to implement a linked list in shared memory using synchronization primitives: Compare-and-swap; Fetch-and-add; Load-link/store-conditional; Several strategies for implementing non-blocking lists have been suggested.
The list starts out with a single node, the sentinel node which has the next and previous pointers point to itself. This condition determines if the list is empty. In a non-empty list, the sentinel node's next pointer gives the head of the list, and the previous pointer gives the tail of the list.
C++'s Standard Template Library provides the class templates std::deque and std::list, for the multiple array and linked list implementations, respectively. As of Java 6, Java's Collections Framework provides a new Deque interface that provides the functionality of insertion and removal at both ends.
Chained-Hash-Insert(T, k) insert x at the head of linked list T[h(k)] Chained-Hash-Search(T, k) search for an element with key k in linked list T[h(k)] Chained-Hash-Delete(T, k) delete x from the linked list T[h(k)] If the element is comparable either numerically or lexically, and inserted into the list by maintaining the total order, it ...
The erase–remove idiom cannot be used for containers that return const_iterator (e.g.: set) [6] std::remove and/or std::remove_if do not maintain elements that are removed (unlike std::partition, std::stable_partition). Thus, erase–remove can only be used with containers holding elements with full value semantics without incurring resource ...
list implements a doubly linked list. forward_list implements a singly linked list. Since each of the containers needs to be able to copy its elements in order to function properly, the type of the elements must fulfill CopyConstructible and Assignable requirements. [2] For a given container, all elements must belong to the same type.
Both of these make unrolled linked lists more attractive. Because unrolled linked list nodes each store a count next to the next field, retrieving the kth element of an unrolled linked list (indexing) can be done in n/m + 1 cache misses, up to a factor of m better than ordinary linked lists. Additionally, if the size of each element is small ...