Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Japanese has lexical forms and a morphological device to signify causation. Lexical forms come in pairs of intransitive and transitive verbs, where the causee is mostly inanimate. ochiru "to fall" → otosu "to drop (something) or to let fall"
Generalized to stochastic versions (stochastic transitivity), the study of transitivity finds applications of in decision theory, psychometrics and utility models. [19] A quasitransitive relation is another generalization; [5] it is required to be transitive only on its non-symmetric part. Such relations are used in social choice theory or ...
Traditionally, transitivity patterns are thought of as lexical information of the verb, but recent research in construction grammar and related theories has argued that transitivity is a grammatical rather than a lexical property, since the same verb very often appears with different transitivity in different contexts. [citation needed] Consider:
Transitivity (grammar), a property regarding whether a lexical item denotes a transitive object; Transitive verb, a verb which takes an object; Transitive case, a grammatical case to mark arguments of a transitive verb
The definition of a direct–inverse language is a matter under research in linguistic typology, but it is widely understood to involve different grammar for transitive predications according to the relative positions of their "subject" and their "object" on a person hierarchy, which, in turn, is some combination of saliency and animacy specific to a given language.
In linguistic typology, active–stative alignment (also split intransitive alignment or semantic alignment) is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the sole argument ("subject") of an intransitive clause (often symbolized as S) is sometimes marked in the same way as an agent of a transitive verb (that is, like a subject such as "I" or "she" in English) but other times in the same way ...
Japanese verbs, like the verbs of many other languages, ... When a pair of verbs are not directly related but happen during a shared period of time, only the ...
In linguistic typology, tripartite alignment is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the main argument ('subject') of an intransitive verb, the agent argument ('subject') of a transitive verb, and the patient argument ('direct object') of a transitive verb are each treated distinctly in the grammatical system of a language. [1]