Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A type of source that is good for scientific information is not usually as reliable for political information, and vice versa. Since Wikipedia's readers may make medical decisions based on information found in our articles, [ 1 ] we want to use high-quality sources when writing about biomedical information.
MEDLINE (Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, or MEDLARS Online) is a bibliographic database of life sciences and biomedical information. It includes bibliographic information for articles from academic journals covering medicine, nursing, pharmacy, dentistry, veterinary medicine, and health care.
Biomedical information must be based on reliable, third-party published secondary sources, and must accurately reflect current knowledge.This guideline supports the general sourcing policy with specific attention to what is appropriate for medical content in any Wikipedia article, including those on alternative medicine.
But nonprofessional users could benefit from reliable health information in a layperson-accessible format. [6] [7] [8] The National Library of Medicine introduced MedlinePlus in October 1998, to provide a non-commercial online service similar, for example, to the commercial WebMD. In 2010 another NCBI service, PubMed Health, complemented ...
Also Dispatches 2008-06-30: Sources in biology and medicine and Dispatches 2008-07-28: Find reliable sources online which as per talk page of the former were initially one guide but then split for dispatch purposes. I asked at citing sources a few months ago about where an actual guideline along those lines might go, but no response.
PubMed is a free database including primarily the MEDLINE database of references and abstracts on life sciences and biomedical topics. The United States National Library of Medicine (NLM) at the National Institutes of Health maintains the database as part of the Entrez system of information retrieval.
Here is a quick first cut at some wording: "Technically, the previous-work section of a primary source is a secondary source, but it is written from the point of view of the primary source and generally speaking it is not more reliable than the rest of the primary source is; so for the purpose of WP:MEDRS it can be treated as having the ...
Sandy, the first objection to the source on the talk page was that if patients knew the facts about (cytotoxic) chemotherapy's limited contribution to cancer treatment (in most, but not all, solid tumors, surgery is far more important), then some of them would refuse treatment.