enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ohio v. Clark - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_v._Clark

    Ohio v. Clark , 576 U.S. 237 (2015), is United States Supreme Court case opinion that narrowed the standard set in Crawford v. Washington for determining whether hearsay statements in criminal cases are permitted under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment .

  3. Prior consistent statements and prior inconsistent statements

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prior_consistent...

    However, under Federal Rule of Evidence 801 and the minority of U.S. jurisdictions that have adopted this rule, a prior inconsistent statement may be introduced as evidence of the truth of the statement itself if the prior statement was given in live testimony and under oath as part of a formal hearing, proceeding, trial, or deposition. [2]

  4. McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McIntyre_v._Ohio_Elections...

    McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission, 514 U.S. 334 (1995), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an Ohio statute prohibiting anonymous campaign literature is unconstitutional because it violates the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects the freedom of speech.

  5. Local prosecutor's office argues case at Ohio Supreme Court ...

    www.aol.com/local-prosecutors-office-argues-case...

    ZANESVILLE − The Muskingum County Prosecutor’s Office is awaiting a decision from the Ohio Supreme Court regarding evidence in a local custody case.. The local prosecutor's office argued on ...

  6. Brady disclosure - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_disclosure

    The Brady doctrine is a pretrial discovery rule that was established by the United States Supreme Court in Brady v. Maryland (1963). [2] The rule requires that the prosecution must turn over all exculpatory evidence to the defendant in a criminal case.

  7. Harte-Hanks Communications, Inc. v. Connaughton - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harte-Hanks_Communications...

    Harte-Hanks Communications Inc. v. Connaughton, 491 U.S. 657 (1989), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States supplied an additional journalistic behavior that constitutes actual malice as first discussed in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964). [1]

  8. Gun zealots stop crowing. No real evidence Ohio's permitless ...

    www.aol.com/gun-zealots-stop-crowing-no...

    States that changed their laws without including one or more of these provisions saw an average increase of 21.6 % in gun assaults and 34.9% increase in gun homicides compared to forecasted trends.

  9. Accused: Ohio man once considered exonerated by DNA evidence ...

    www.aol.com/accused-ohio-man-once-considered...

    Circumstantial evidence outside of the DNA-linked bite injury also pointed to Prade being the killer, he said. "Nothing has changed in the past 10 years," Pollack said.