enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Apprendi v. New Jersey - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apprendi_v._New_Jersey

    Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision with regard to aggravating factors in crimes. The Court ruled that the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial, incorporated against the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibited judges from enhancing criminal sentences beyond statutory maxima based on facts other than those decided by the ...

  3. Blakely v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blakely_v._Washington

    New Jersey: "Other than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt." This rule promoted the historic concerns of the jury-trial requirement — to subject all accusations against a criminal defendant to ...

  4. Cunningham v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cunningham_v._California

    New Jersey (2000) applies to California's determinate sentencing law. In California, a judge may choose one of three sentences for a crime—a low, middle, or high term. There must exist specific aggravating factors about the crime before a judge may impose the high term. Under the Apprendi rule, as explained in Blakely v.

  5. These are the factors New Jersey residents must consider in ...

    www.aol.com/factors-jersey-residents-must...

    For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  6. List of punishments for murder in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_punishments_for...

    2.30 New Jersey. 2.31 New Mexico. 2.32 New York. 2.33 North ... if mitigating factors exist the judge may set a minimum term of between 25 and 40 years before parole ...

  7. United States constitutional sentencing law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States...

    Aggravating factors must be found by a jury. [17] Aggravating factors cannot be vague. [18] The sentencing decision-maker must have the authority to consider all mitigating factors. [19] Fourth, the Clause requires certain additional procedural rules in capital cases. For example, the jury must be permitted to consider a lesser included offense ...

  8. Mitigating factor - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitigating_factor

    The Sentencing Council of England and Wales lists the following as possible mitigating factors: [2] Admitting the offense, such as through a guilty plea; Mental illness; Provocation; Young age; Showing remorse; Self-defense is a legal defense rather than a mitigating factor, as an act done in justified self-defense is not deemed to be a crime ...

  9. Business owners should not forget anti-money laundering rule ...

    www.aol.com/news/business-owners-not-forget-anti...

    Small business owners should not forget about a rule — currently in legal limbo — that would require them to register with an agency called the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, or FinCEN ...