enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of jurisdictions subject to the special provisions of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_jurisdictions...

    The following jurisdictions in the United States are or have been subject to the special provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.Jurisdictions encompassed by the coverage formula contained in Section 4(b) are called "covered jurisdictions"; covered jurisdictions are subject to preclearance under Section 5.

  3. California Voting Rights Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_voting_rights_act

    Bill. S.B. 976. Status: Current legislation. The California Voting Rights Act of 2001 (CVRA) is a state law in the state of California. It makes it easier for minority groups in California to prove that their votes are being diluted in "at-large" elections by expanding on the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965. [1] In Thornburg v.

  4. Veterans' Preference Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veterans'_Preference_Act

    The Veterans' Preference Act, enacted by the 78th United States Congress on June 27, 1944, is a landmark federal law that establishes and defines preferences and benefits for honorably discharged veterans in Federal employment. These preferences include considerations for service-connected disabilities, wartime service, and other qualifications.

  5. California bill banning 'legacy' preference in college ...

    www.aol.com/news/california-bill-banning-legacy...

    California's AB 1780, ... California bill banning 'legacy' preference in college admissions heads to Newsom's desk: 'Fair and equitable' Jamie Joseph. September 4, 2024 at 5:30 AM.

  6. Shelby County v. Holder - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shelby_County_v._Holder

    Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), is a landmark decision [1] of the Supreme Court of the United States regarding the constitutionality of two provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965: Section 5, which requires certain states and local governments to obtain federal preclearance before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices; and subsection (b) of Section 4 ...

  7. Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personnel_Administrator_of...

    District of Massachusetts reversed and remanded. U.S. Const. amend. XIV. Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256 (1979), was a case heard by the Supreme Court of the United States. The decision upheld the constitutionality of a state law, which granted a hiring preference to veterans over non-veterans.

  8. Gavin Newsom signs bills to help provide AI protections for ...

    www.aol.com/news/gavin-newsom-signs-bills-help...

    September 17, 2024 at 7:33 PM. California Gov. Gavin Newsom on the first night of the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on Aug. 19. California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed two bills Tuesday ...

  9. Amendments to the Voting Rights Act of 1965 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amendments_to_the_Voting...

    The U.S. Congress enacted major amendments to the Voting Rights Act of 1965 in 1970, 1975, 1982, 1992, and 2006. Each of these amendments coincided with an impending expiration of some of the Act's special provisions, which originally were set to expire by 1970. However, in recognition of the voting discrimination that continued despite the Act ...