enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Thomas Nagel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Nagel

    Thomas Nagel (/ ˈ n eɪ ɡ əl /; born July 4, 1937) is an American philosopher. He is the University Professor of Philosophy and Law Emeritus at New York University , [ 3 ] where he taught from 1980 until his retirement in 2016. [ 4 ]

  3. Moral luck - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_luck

    Thomas Nagel has been criticized by Dana Nelkin for including causal moral luck as a separate category, since it appears largely redundant. It does not cover any cases that are not already included in constitutive and circumstantial luck, and seems to exist only for the purpose of bringing up the problem of free will.

  4. Mind and Cosmos - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind_and_Cosmos

    A Review of Thomas Nagel’s 'Mind and Cosmos'" The Partially Examined Life; Louis B. Jones and P. N. Furbank, "Two Perspectives on Thomas Nagel's Mind and Cosmos The Threepenny Review Fall 2012; John Dupré, untitled review Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews; Brian Leiter and Michael Weisberg, "Do You Only Have a Brain? On Thomas Nagel" The ...

  5. Moral realism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_realism

    Moral objectivism is the view that what is right or wrong does not depend on what anyone thinks is right or wrong, [21] but rather on how it affects people's well-being. . Moral objectivism allows for moral codes to be compared to each other through a set of universal f

  6. Moral responsibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_responsibility

    Thomas Nagel suggests that four different types of luck (including genetic influences and other external factors) end up influencing the way that a person's actions are evaluated morally. For instance, a person driving drunk may make it home without incident, and yet this action of drunk driving might seem more morally objectionable if someone ...

  7. Moral relativism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_relativism

    For example, someone who claims "something is morally right for me to do because the people in my culture think it is right" is both a moral relativist (because what is right and wrong depends on who is doing it), and an ethical subjectivist (because what is right and wrong is determined by mental states, i.e. what people think is right and wrong).

  8. Moral Injury - The Huffington Post

    projects.huffingtonpost.com/moral-injury

    This series came from a determination to understand why, and to explore how their way back from war can be smoothed. Moral injury is a relatively new concept that seems to describe what many feel: a sense that their fundamental understanding of right and wrong has been violated, and the grief, numbness or guilt that often ensues.

  9. Moral absolutism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_absolutism

    Moral absolutism, commonly known as black-and-white morality, is an ethical view that most, if not all actions are intrinsically right or wrong, regardless of context or consequence. Comparison with other ethical theories