Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Nuclear power plants in normal operation emit less radioactivity than coal power plants. [ 69 ] [ 70 ] Unlike coal-fired or oil-fired power generation, nuclear power generation does not directly produce any sulfur dioxide , nitrogen oxides , or mercury (pollution from fossil fuels is blamed for 24,000 early deaths each year in the U.S. alone ...
One of the main concerns regarding nuclear proliferation is to prevent this plutonium from being used by states, other than those already established as nuclear weapons states, to produce nuclear weapons. If the reactor has been used normally, the plutonium is reactor-grade, not weapons-grade: it contains more than 19% 240 Pu and less than 80% ...
A sample of thorium. Thorium-based nuclear power generation is fueled primarily by the nuclear fission of the isotope uranium-233 produced from the fertile element thorium.A thorium fuel cycle can offer several potential advantages over a uranium fuel cycle [Note 1] —including the much greater abundance of thorium found on Earth, superior physical and nuclear fuel properties, and reduced ...
[204] [202] [320] Depending on recycling of renewable energy technologies, nuclear reactors may produce a much smaller volume of waste, although much more toxic, expensive to manage and longer-lived. [ 321 ] [ 248 ] A nuclear plant also needs to be disassembled and removed and much of the disassembled nuclear plant needs to be stored as low ...
The United States currently gets about 20% of its power from nuclear. Inside the US Energy Department, there’s high interest to increase that percentage in the coming years because nuclear ...
The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 established a timetable and procedure for constructing a permanent, underground repository for high-level radioactive waste by the mid-1990s, and provided for some temporary storage of waste, including spent fuel from 104 civilian nuclear reactors that produce about 19.4% of electricity there. [38]
“Yesterday’s nuclear waste is holding back tomorrow’s reactors.” Richland nuclear plant could be 1st in U.S. to produce power this way under new deal Skip to main content
There have been proposals for reactors that consume nuclear waste and transmute it to other, less-harmful or shorter-lived, nuclear waste. In particular, the integral fast reactor was a proposed nuclear reactor with a nuclear fuel cycle that produced no transuranic waste and, in fact, could consume transuranic waste. It proceeded as far as ...