enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Times_Co._v._Sullivan

    New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that ruled the freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution restrict the ability of a public official to sue for defamation.

  3. United States v. Sullivan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Sullivan

    United States v. Sullivan, 274 U.S. 259 (1927), is a United States Supreme Court case that allowed prosecution of criminals for income tax evasion notwithstanding the Fifth Amendment. [1] The case also served as the legal test for prosecution of Al Capone for tax evasion by Assistant Attorney General Mabel Walker Willebrandt. Willebrandt ...

  4. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas thinks the press has ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-justice-clarence...

    As Thomas again urges the Supreme Court to reconsider its 1964 ruling in New York Times v. Sullivan, Vera Eielman of the ACLU says “breathing space for people to exercise their First Amendment ...

  5. Actual malice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actual_malice

    This term was adopted by the Supreme Court in its landmark 1964 ruling in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, [2] in which the Warren Court held that: . The constitutional guarantees require, we think, a Federal rule that prohibits a public official from recovering damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with 'actual malice ...

  6. 'Alarming' vs 'narrow': Senate split on Supreme Court ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/alarming-vs-narrow-senate-split...

    Senators polarized over meaning of Supreme Court ruling. The chairman, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., called the decision “a game-changing act of judicial fiat that puts all future presidents above ...

  7. Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bantam_Books,_Inc._v._Sullivan

    Bantam Books, Inc. v. Sullivan, 372 U.S. 58 (1963), [1] was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the actions of the Rhode Island Commission to Encourage Morality in Youth, which involved pressuring distributors to stop selling certain publications, violated the First Amendment by creating an unconstitutional system of informal censorship. [2]

  8. Supreme Court unanimous ruling may pave way for mass ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-unanimous-ruling-may...

    (The Center Square) – A unanimous ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court may pave the way for challenges to a federal deportation plan under the incoming Trump administration to be defeated. The ...

  9. Sullivan v. Zebley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sullivan_v._Zebley

    Sullivan v. Zebley, 493 U.S. 521 (1990), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court involving the determination of childhood Social Security Disability benefits. [1]