enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Dark money - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_money

    The rise of dark money groups was aided by the U.S. Supreme Court decisions in FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. (2008) and Citizens United v. FEC (2010). [4] In Citizens United, the Court ruled (by a 5–4 vote) that corporations and unions could spend unlimited amounts of money to advocate for or against political candidates. [14]

  3. Citizens United v. FEC - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_v._FEC

    Gerken H. "The real problem with Citizens United: Campaign finance, dark money, and shadow parties" 97 Marquette Law Review (2014) 903. Hansen, Wendy L., Michael S. Rocca, and Brittany Leigh Ortiz. "The effects of Citizens United on corporate spending in the 2012 presidential election." Journal of Politics 77.2 (2015): 535–545. in JSTOR; Kang, M.

  4. Shadow campaigns in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow_Campaigns_in_the...

    Shadow campaigns (or dark money) refers to spending meant to influence political outcomes where the source of the money is not publicly disclosed or is difficult to trace. [1] United States campaign finance law has been regulated by the Federal Election Commission since its creation in the wake of the Watergate Scandal in 1975, and in the years ...

  5. Citizens United (organization) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citizens_United_(organization)

    Citizens United is a conservative 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization in the United States founded in 1988. In 2010, the organization won a U.S. Supreme Court case known as Citizens United v. FEC , which struck down as unconstitutional a federal law prohibiting corporations and unions from making expenditures in connection with federal elections.

  6. Column: Exploring the origins of Supreme Court's Citizens ...

    www.aol.com/column-exploring-origins-supreme...

    Columnist argues Citizens United was based on a headnote on an 1886 ruling, not the ruling itself. Skip to main content. 24/7 Help. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to ...

  7. DISCLOSE Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DISCLOSE_Act

    The bill would amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to provide for greater and faster public disclosure of campaign spending and to combat the use of "dark money" in U.S. elections (which increased from $69 million in 2008 to $310 million in 2012). [5]

  8. Americans for Prosperity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americans_for_Prosperity

    As of mid-September 2018, AFP has become one of just 15 groups that account for three-quarters of the anonymous cash following the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. FEC, which paved the way for dark money to flow into U.S. elections. [36] [37] In 2023 in Wyoming, Tyler Lindholm formed the 36th state chapter of Americans for Prosperity.

  9. Josh Hawley versus Citizens United: Great, but what game is ...

    www.aol.com/josh-hawley-versus-citizens-united...

    And as The Star’s Jonathan Shorman pointed out in his reporting, the bill would also leave untouched so-called “dark money” groups, which spend money on elections without disclosing their ...