Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever is a logic puzzle so called by American philosopher and logician George Boolos and published in The Harvard Review of Philosophy in 1996. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] Boolos' article includes multiple ways of solving the problem.
In more complex puzzles, he introduces characters who may lie or tell the truth (referred to as "normals"), and furthermore instead of answering "yes" or "no", use words which mean "yes" or "no", but the reader does not know which word means which. The puzzle known as "the hardest logic puzzle ever" is based on these characters and themes. In ...
[1] Five room puzzle – Cross each wall of a diagram exactly once with a continuous line. [2] MU puzzle – Transform the string MI to MU according to a set of rules. [3] Mutilated chessboard problem – Place 31 dominoes of size 2×1 on a chessboard with two opposite corners removed. [4] Coloring the edges of the Petersen graph with three ...
For example, if s=2, then 𝜁(s) is the well-known series 1 + 1/4 + 1/9 + 1/16 + …, which strangely adds up to exactly 𝜋²/6. When s is a complex number—one that looks like a+b𝑖, using ...
Answering a question wrong results in the game producing a bomb sound to indicate the player losing a life, [1] and having to pick another answer before proceeding to the next question. [2] The game ends when players lose all three lives. However, some questions have a time limit ranging from one to ten seconds; if the player fails to answer ...
lwr314 (continued) 'The Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever' refers to a puzzle by Boolos! That includes his interpretation. A pile of text on paper is not a puzzle, it is a pile of text on paper. An interpreted pile of text on paper can be a puzzle. Boolos' interpreted his pile of text on paper and that is called `The Hardest Logic Puzzle Ever'.
[1] Can one find a simple closed quasigeodesic on a convex polyhedron in polynomial time? [2] Can a simultaneous embedding with fixed edges for two given graphs be found in polynomial time? [3] Can the square-root sum problem be solved in polynomial time in the Turing machine model?
If 'algorithm' is understood as meaning a method that can be represented as a Turing machine, and with the answer to the latter question negative (in general), the question about the existence of an algorithm for the Entscheidungsproblem also must be negative (in general). In his 1936 paper, Turing says: "Corresponding to each computing machine ...