enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Confounding - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confounding

    Depending on the type of study design in place, there are various ways to modify that design to actively exclude or control confounding variables: [26] Case-control studies assign confounders to both groups, cases and controls, equally. For example, if somebody wanted to study the cause of myocardial infarct and thinks that the age is a ...

  3. Spurious relationship - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spurious_relationship

    Graphical model: Whereas a mediator is a factor in the causal chain (top), a confounder is a spurious factor incorrectly implying causation (bottom). In statistics, a spurious relationship or spurious correlation [1] [2] is a mathematical relationship in which two or more events or variables are associated but not causally related, due to either coincidence or the presence of a certain third ...

  4. We Were Wrong To Panic About Secondhand Smoke (opinion) - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/were-wrong-panic-secondhand...

    Yet studies that directly measure ETS exposure represent a higher order of evidence than epidemiologic studies, avoiding the pitfalls of examining the association between an exposure proxy and a ...

  5. Propensity score matching - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propensity_score_matching

    Propensity scores are used to reduce confounding by equating groups based on these covariates. Suppose that we have a binary treatment indicator Z, a response variable r, and background observed covariates X. The propensity score is defined as the conditional probability of treatment given background variables:

  6. Simpson's paradox - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpson's_paradox

    The phenomenon may disappear or even reverse if the data is stratified differently or if different confounding variables are considered. Simpson's example actually highlighted a phenomenon called noncollapsibility, [32] which occurs when subgroups with high proportions do not make simple averages when combined. This suggests that the paradox ...

  7. Correlation does not imply causation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply...

    All of those examples deal with a lurking variable, which is simply a hidden third variable that affects both of the variables observed to be correlated. That third variable is also known as a confounding variable, with the slight difference that confounding variables need not be hidden and may thus be corrected for in an analysis. Note that ...

  8. Stratification (clinical trials) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stratification_(clinical...

    Stratification can be used to control for confounding variables (variables other than those the researcher is studying), thereby making it easier for the research to detect and interpret relationships between variables. [1] For example, if doing a study of fitness where age or gender was expected to influence the outcomes, participants could be ...

  9. Controlling for a variable - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlling_for_a_variable

    This is typically done so that the variable can no longer act as a confounder in, for example, an observational study or experiment. When estimating the effect of explanatory variables on an outcome by regression, controlled-for variables are included as inputs in order to separate their effects from the explanatory variables. [1]