enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monell_v._Department_of...

    Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978), is an opinion given by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court overruled Monroe v. Pape by holding that a local government is a "person" subject to suit under Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code: Civil action for deprivation of rights. [1]

  3. Qualified immunity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_immunity

    Qualified immunity frequently arises in civil rights cases, [7] particularly in lawsuits arising under 42 USC § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents (1971). [8] Under 42 USC § 1983, a plaintiff can sue for damages when state officials violate their constitutional rights or other federal rights. The text of 42 USC § 1983 reads as ...

  4. Ku Klux Klan Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan_Act

    Section 1 (42 USC § 1983) [ edit ] Section 1 of the Act, which has since been amended and codified as section 1979 of the Revised Statutes ( 42 U.S.C. § 1983) and is also known simply as "Section 1983", authorized monetary and injunctive relief against anyone who, acting under the authority of state law, deprived a person of rights guaranteed ...

  5. Monroe v. Pape - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monroe_v._Pape

    The case was significant because it held that 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a statutory provision from 1871, could be used to sue state officers who violated a plaintiff's constitutional rights. [3] § 1983 had previously been a relatively obscure and little-used statute, but since Monroe it has become a central part of United States civil rights law.

  6. Hawkins v. Town of Shaw - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawkins_v._Town_of_Shaw

    It was the most prominent in a series of cases which had increased the scope of 42 USC § 1983 in actions against local governments. [14] The decision left open the issue of unequal provision of services according to wealth and for this reason some commentators doubted its wide applicability. [15] [16] The 1976 Supreme Court case Washington

  7. Thompson v. Clark - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thompson_v._Clark

    iv, 42 u.s.c. § 1983 Clark , 596 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning whether a plaintiff suing for malicious prosecution must show that they were affirmatively exonerated of committing the alleged crime.

  8. California to remove racist term for Native American Woman ...

    www.aol.com/california-remove-racist-term-native...

    The law asks that the term be removed "all geographic features and place names in the state" by Jan. 1, 2025. "The term is recognized as a racial, ethnic, and gender-based slur, particularly aimed ...

  9. Williams v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williams_v._Washington

    Whether exhaustion of state administrative remedies is required to bring claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in state court. Washington (Docket No. 23-191) is a pending United States Supreme Court case related to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.