Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The simple Sethi–Ullman algorithm works as follows (for a load/store architecture): . Traverse the abstract syntax tree in pre- or postorder . For every leaf node, if it is a non-constant left-child, assign a 1 (i.e. 1 register is needed to hold the variable/field/etc.), otherwise assign a 0 (it is a non-constant right child or constant leaf node (RHS of an operation – literals, values)).
Dijkstra's algorithm, as another example of a uniform-cost search algorithm, can be viewed as a special case of A* where = for all x. [ 12 ] [ 13 ] General depth-first search can be implemented using A* by considering that there is a global counter C initialized with a very large value.
function simple memory bounded A *-star (problem): path queue: set of nodes, ordered by f-cost; begin queue. insert (problem. root-node); while True do begin if queue. empty then return failure; //there is no solution that fits in the given memory node:= queue. begin (); // min-f-cost-node if problem. is-goal (node) then return success; s:= next-successor (node) if! problem. is-goal (s ...
The problem is NP-hard, so there is no known algorithm for solving this problem in polynomial time, and even small instances may require long computation time. It was also proven that the problem does not have an approximation algorithm running in polynomial time for any (constant) factor, unless P = NP. [2]
The first three stages of Johnson's algorithm are depicted in the illustration below. The graph on the left of the illustration has two negative edges, but no negative cycles. The center graph shows the new vertex q, a shortest path tree as computed by the Bellman–Ford algorithm with q as starting vertex, and the values h(v) computed at each other node as the length of the shortest path from ...
The main problem of these algorithms is the possible presence of plateaus, which are regions of the space of assignments where no local move decreases cost. The second class of local search algorithm have been invented to solve this problem. They escape these plateaus by doing random moves, and are called randomized local search algorithms.
The algorithm was introduced by Philippe Flajolet and G. Nigel Martin in their 1984 article "Probabilistic Counting Algorithms for Data Base Applications". [1] Later it has been refined in "LogLog counting of large cardinalities" by Marianne Durand and Philippe Flajolet , [ 2 ] and " HyperLogLog : The analysis of a near-optimal cardinality ...
The NIST Dictionary of Algorithms and Data Structures [1] is a reference work maintained by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. It defines a large number of terms relating to algorithms and data structures. For algorithms and data structures not necessarily mentioned here, see list of algorithms and list of data structures.