Ad
related to: wikipedia drop mix reviews and comments for websites templates- DIY Website Builder Tools
Breaking Down The Best Tools App
Do It Yourself Like A Pro
- Wix Review
Amazing Drag & Drop Website Design
Visually Stunning & Easy to Use
- Top 5 SMB Website Builder
The Best for Small Businesses
All What You Need For Your Business
- SEO Friendly Web Builders
Top 3 SEO Friendly Website Builders
Compare Between The 3 Best Builders
- DIY Website Builder Tools
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The following are a list of arguments that can commonly be seen in deletion reviews for templates, images, categories, stub types, redirects and especially articles which should generally be avoided, or at least, supplemented with some more arguments. There is a common misconception that deletion review is "AfD Round 2."
The simplest way to add this template to an article is to copy and paste {{Review|date=December 2024}} at the top of the article or talk page. Add a new item to the talk page explaining the problem so editors will know what to address, and when to remove this tag.
To request a Peer review, edit the article talk page, add {} to the top of the page, and save the page. This will create this template ({{Peer review}}) with a link to a new peer review page for the article. Follow this link, and add your request in the edit box as instructed.
Wikipedia's peer review is a way to receive ideas on how to improve articles that are already decent. It may be used for potential good article nominations, potential featured article candidates, or an article of any "grade" (but if the article isn't well-developed, please read here before asking for a peer review).
You can find the list of all current peer reviews in different formats: a list with reviewers' comments included, a list without any reviewers' comments or a list by date. The peer review list on this page is automatically generated: please follow the steps on the instructions page to add or remove a review.
To conduct a review: Create a review record: from an edit window, copy the Review section below to the bottom of the talk page of the page to be reviewed. If the page does not yet have a {{DocumentHistory}} template in its talk page header, add one at the same time. Add an entry to the template to record the review, with a status of "ongoing".
Ah yes, the dreaded peer review. Everyone at featured article candidacy always telling you to go there, get the article polished up, and come back. Trouble is, it can be extremely difficult to get even a single comment, even for many months! Surely, there must be a better way to get comments than that.
The draft submission template is merely used to keep track of unsubmitted drafts. Once it has been submitted for review, this template should be removed. ArticlesForCreationBot is tasked with removing the draft submission template, so only the pending review template should remain. If a draft submission meets the quick fail criteria, then it is ...
Ad
related to: wikipedia drop mix reviews and comments for websites templates