enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Baby Doe Law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_Doe_Law

    However, on October 9, 1984, the final Baby Doe law, known as the Baby Doe Amendment, amended the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act of 1974 to include the withholding of fluids, food, and medically indicated treatment from disabled newborns. This law went into effect on June 1, 1985, and is still in effect.

  3. List of medical ethics cases - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_medical_ethics_cases

    Withholding life-prolonging treatment case country location year summary Baby Doe Law: United States New York: 1983 The parents of a child born with severe birth defects request the right to refuse treatment and keep the child off life support. Baby M: Australia Melbourne: 1989

  4. Plyler v. Doe - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plyler_v._Doe

    Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982), was a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States struck down both a state statute denying funding for education of undocumented immigrant children in the United States and an independent school district's attempt to charge an annual $1,000 tuition fee for each student to compensate for lost state funding. [1]

  5. Texas Advance Directives Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_Advance_Directives_Act

    On March 15, 2005, six-month-old infant Sun Hudson, who had a lethal congenital malformation, was one of the first children to have care withdrawn under the Texas Futile Treatment Law. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] Doctors demonstrated in the ethics committee reviews that keeping the infant on a respirator would only delay his inevitable death.

  6. Wisconsin v. Yoder - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_v._Yoder

    Yoder, all states must grant the Old Order Amish the right to establish their own schools (should they choose) or to withdraw from public institutions after completing eighth grade. In some communities Amish parents have continued to send their children to public elementary schools even after Wisconsin v.

  7. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruzan_v._Director...

    The right to commit suicide, he added, was not a due process right protected in the Constitution. As legal scholar Susan Stefan writes: "[Justice Scalia] argued that states had the right to 'prevent, by force if necessary,' people from committing suicide, including refusing treatment when that refusal would cause the patient to die." [9] p. 28

  8. Biden administration issues rules against withholding ...

    www.aol.com/finance/biden-administration-issues...

    Withholding transcripts. Over 6.6 million students have their transcripts withheld due to unpaid balances, preventing students from transferring or getting job opportunities that require ...

  9. Parents' Bill of Rights - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parents'_Bill_of_Rights

    The Parents' Bill of Rights stipulates that a parent has a right to be the primary decision-maker with respect to their child's education, including the right to withdraw their child from sexual health education and the right to withhold consent for the use of gender-related names or pronouns if the child is under 16 years of age.