Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
However, GPLv3 software could only be combined and share code with GPLv2 software if the GPLv2 license used had the optional "or later" clause and the software was upgraded to GPLv3. While the "GPLv2 or any later version" clause is considered by FSF as the most common form of licensing GPLv2 software, [43] Toybox developer Rob Landley described ...
"Free Software Foundation Releases GNU Affero General Public License Version 3" (Press release). Smith, Brett (March 29, 2007), GPLv3 and Software as a Service – also includes info on version 2 of the Affero GPL. Kuhn, Bradley M. (March 19, 2002).
Gplv3. Add languages. Add links. Article; Talk; ... Download as PDF; Printable version; From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ... GNU General Public License#Version 3 ...
[3] [4] The OSI does not endorse FSF license analysis (interpretation) as per their disclaimer. [ 5 ] The FSF's Free Software Definition focuses on the user's unrestricted rights to use a program, to study and modify it, to copy it, and to redistribute it for any purpose, which are considered by the FSF the four essential freedoms .
The Apache Software Foundation and the Free Software Foundation agree that the Apache License 2.0 is a free software license, compatible with the GNU General Public License [5] (GPL) version 3, [2] meaning that code under GPLv3 and Apache License 2.0 can be combined, as long as the resulting software is licensed under the GPLv3. [6]
Download QR code; Print/export Download as PDF; ... It is free and open-source software licensed under the GNU General Public License Version 3 (GNU GPLv3). [3]
Anki - the desktop version is under GNU AGPL, the Android version is under GPLv3.0 [1] Bacula; BEdita 3 Open; BerkeleyDB - a B-tree NoSQL database developed by Oracle, the open source license is under GNU AGPL [2] Bitwarden password management service server code; Booktype - online book production platform
License compatibility is a legal framework that allows for pieces of software with different software licenses to be distributed together. The need for such a framework arises because the different licenses can contain contradictory requirements, rendering it impossible to legally combine source code from separately-licensed software in order to create and publish a new program.