Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Fuel consumption monitor from a 2006 Honda Airwave.The displayed fuel economy is 18.1 km/L (5.5 L/100 km; 43 mpg ‑US). A Briggs and Stratton Flyer from 1916. Originally an experiment in creating a fuel-saving automobile in the United States, the vehicle weighed only 135 lb (61.2 kg) and was an adaptation of a small gasoline engine originally designed to power a bicycle.
For example, the fuel economy target for the 2012 Honda Fit with a footprint of 40 sq ft (3.7 m 2) is 36 miles per US gallon (6.5 L/100 km), equivalent to a published fuel economy of 27 miles per US gallon (8.7 L/100 km) (see #Calculations of MPG overestimated for information regarding the difference), and a Ford F-150 with its footprint of 65 ...
For example, replacing a car that gets 16 mpg-US (19 mpg-imp or 15 L/100 km) with a car that gets 30 mpg-US (36 mpg-imp or 8 L/100 km) saves 3 US gallons (2.5 imp gal) of fuel every 100 miles (7 L/100 km). Because the combustion of 1 US gallon of fuel emits 20 pounds of carbon dioxide (burning 1 imp gal emits 24 lb and burning 1 L emits 2.4 kg ...
[37] Car and Driver also tested a Fusion Hybrid and achieved no more than 34 mpg ‑US (6.9 L/100 km; 41 mpg ‑imp) over 300 miles (480 km) of driving, which was greater than the Camry Hybrid (31 miles per US gallon (7.6 L/100 km; 37 mpg ‑imp)) or Nissan Altima Hybrid (32 miles per US gallon (7.4 L/100 km; 38 mpg ‑imp)) though not by the ...
This version of the 3.7 L (3,726 cc) features Twin Independent Variable Cam Timing (Ti-VCT); delivers 31 mpg ‑US (7.6 L/100 km; 37 mpg ‑imp) highway mileage in the Mustang, and was the first production engine to deliver in excess of 300 hp (224 kW) and 30 mpg ‑US (7.8 L/100 km; 36 mpg ‑imp). [6]
Fuel consumption in a combined cycle format is as low as 7.6 L/100 km (37 mpg ‑imp; 31 mpg ‑US) on the rear-wheel-drive variant to 8.1 L/100 km (35 mpg ‑imp; 29 mpg ‑US) on the 4Motion version, which theoretically gives the Amarok a 1,000 km (620 mi) range before filling up for fuel.
The most efficient model had a highway fuel economy rating of 31 mpg ‑US (7.6 L/100 km; 37 mpg ‑imp), [3] which was 45% better than the Liberty/Cherokee it replaced, [7] [8] and a driving range of 495 miles (797 km). Optional for the Cherokee was Chrysler's new 3.2 L Pentastar V6 engine.
6.9 L/100 km (41 mpg ‑imp; 34 mpg ‑US) 1.4 8v: K7J LPG: 1,390 cc: 72 hp (53 kW) 13.0 s: 161 km/h (100 mph) 9.2 L/100 km (31 mpg ‑imp; 26 mpg ‑US) (LPG) 1.6 8v: K7M 800: 1,598 cc: 85 hp (63 kW) 12.9 s: 169 km/h (105 mph) 6.7 L/100 km (42 mpg ‑imp; 35 mpg ‑US) 1.6 8v: K7M Hi-Torque: 1,598 cc: 95 hp (70 kW) 11.7 s: 174 km/h (108 mph ...