Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Gödel sentence of the theory is a formula , sometimes denoted , such that proves ↔ (#). Gödel's proof shows that if T {\displaystyle T} is consistent then it cannot prove its Gödel sentence; but in order to show that the negation of the Gödel sentence is also not provable, it is necessary to add a stronger assumption that the ...
In linguistics, a comparative illusion (CI) or Escher sentence [a] is a comparative sentence which initially seems to be acceptable but upon closer reflection has no well-formed, sensical meaning. The typical example sentence used to typify this phenomenon is More people have been to Russia than I have .
The following is an example of a pure imperative inference: P1. Do both of the following: wash the dishes and clean your room! C1. Therefore, clean your room! In this case, all the sentences making up the argument are imperatives. Not all imperative inferences are of this kind. Consider again: P1. Take all the books off the table! P2.
Created Date: 8/30/2012 4:52:52 PM
Sentences are then built up out of atomic sentences by applying connectives and quantifiers. A set of sentences is called a theory; thus, individual sentences may be called theorems. To properly evaluate the truth (or falsehood) of a sentence, one must make reference to an interpretation of the theory.
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
A famous example for lexical ambiguity is the following sentence: "Wenn hinter Fliegen Fliegen fliegen, fliegen Fliegen Fliegen hinterher.", meaning "When flies fly behind flies, then flies fly in pursuit of flies." [40] [circular reference] It takes advantage of some German nouns and corresponding verbs being homonymous. While not noticeable ...
April 16, 2010 Dear Friend: We’re writing with a very unusual request — that you pledge not to give any campaign contributions to any candidate for Congress until they have