Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Neutral parties are often perceived as more trustworthy, reliable, and safe. [ 3 ] [ 8 ] Alternative to acting without a bias, the bias of neutrality itself is the expectation upon the Swiss government (in armed neutrality ), [ 9 ] and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (in non-interventionism ). [ 3 ]
More specifically, a mediator is defined as a person who attempts to resolve a conflict between two group members by intervening in this conflict. Put simply, the mediator can be thought of as a disinterested guide directs the disputants through the process of developing a solution to a disagreement. [1]
One type is disagreements about facts. For instance, a disagreement about the question whether earth is spherical or flat. The second type of disagreements is about a proposed course of action, for example, whether one should travel to Italy or Greece. [2] This philosophical discussion is mainly about “peer disagreement”.
Because the neutral point of view policy is often unfamiliar to newcomers yet central to Wikipedia's approach, many issues surrounding the neutrality policy have been covered extensively before. If you have some new contribution(s) to make to the debate, you could try Talk:Neutral point of view, or bring it up on the Wikipedia mailing list ...
A neutral point of view should be achieved by balancing the bias in sources based on the weight of the opinion in reliable sources and not by excluding sources that do not conform to the editor's point of view. This does not mean any biased source must be used; it may well serve an article better to exclude the material altogether.
"No response can be a polite way to disagree without needing to articulate every last point," Porter says. "There is such a frenzy to reply one way or another that it can be a gentle rebuke." 4.
Biased search, interpretation and memory have been invoked to explain attitude polarization (when a disagreement becomes more extreme even though the different parties are exposed to the same evidence), belief perseverance (when beliefs persist after the evidence for them is shown to be false), the irrational primacy effect (a greater reliance ...
Still, it is clear Boyer’s innate optimism faces challenges processing what he hears from Trump and what he sees from some voters, including fellow Black men in his own beloved community.