enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Sexual harassment in the workplace in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_harassment_in_the...

    Sexual harassment in the workplace in US labor law has been considered a form of discrimination on the basis of sex in the United States since the mid-1970s. [1] [2] There are two forms of sexual harassment recognized by United States law: quid pro quo sexual harassment (requiring an employee to tolerate sexual harassment to keep their job, receive a tangible benefit, or avoid punishment) and ...

  3. Workplace harassment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workplace_harassment

    It may entail quid pro quo harassment, which occurs in cases in which employment decisions or treatment are based on submission to or rejection of unwelcome conduct ...

  4. NYPD lieutenant who raked in $200K in OT wants suspension ...

    www.aol.com/nypd-lieutenant-raked-200k-ot...

    Quathisha Epps, 51, faced “quid pro quo sexual harassment” while working for Maddrey, her lawyer alleged in a Tuesday letter to NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch calling for the lieutenant’s ...

  5. Sexual harassment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_harassment

    Examples of this include gestures, taunts, hazing, threats, sexual slurs, etc. Gender harassment is the most widespread form of harassment but its typically ignored because it is not seen as big of an issue as other forms of sexual harassment. Sexual coercion includes the exchange of sexual acts/favors for job related benefits (quid pro quo).

  6. Barnes v. Train - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnes_v._Train

    Saxbe (1976) decision by a U.S. District Court which ruled that quid pro quo sexual harassment constitutes sex discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. [3] Barnes also found that companies are liable for not stopping sexual harassment if they know it is being conducted by supervisors. [3] As a result of Barnes v.

  7. Quid pro quo allegations are key in Madigan corruption trial

    www.aol.com/news/quid-pro-quo-allegations-key...

    (The Center Square) – Quid pro quo allegations are a key part of the U.S. government’s corruption case against former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan and codefendant Michael McClain.

  8. Catharine A. MacKinnon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catharine_A._MacKinnon

    Vinson that sexual harassment may violate laws against sex discrimination. MacKinnon was co-counsel for Mechelle Vinson, the plaintiff, and wrote the brief in the Supreme Court. In Meritor, the Court recognized the distinction between quid pro quo sexual harassment and hostile workplace harassment. In a 2002 article, MacKinnon wrote, quoting ...

  9. Former Illinois House speaker discusses codefendant, 'quid ...

    www.aol.com/news/former-illinois-house-speaker...

    A frame from undercover video captured July 18, 2017, featuring former Illinois House Speaker Michael Madigan presented to a jury during Madigan's corruption trial Monday, Nov. 25, 2024.