Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Nature versus nurture is a long-standing debate in biology and society about the relative influence on human beings of their genetic inheritance (nature) and the environmental conditions of their development .
David Moore reviewed The Mirage of a Space Between Nature and Nurture favorably in the journal Science & Education.He concluded, "For its careful analysis of the causes of the confusion that continues to keep the nature/nurture debate alive long after it has become clear that the questions motivating the debate have been ill-formed, Fox Keller’s book can be highly recommended for classroom ...
"Nature and Nurture" Current Opinion in Psychiatry, September, 2001: 14: 486–490. "Genes, Concepts, DST Implications, and the Possibility of Prototypes: Comments on Stotz and Griffiths, Burian, and Walters", History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 2004;26(1):81-90.
The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature. Matt Ridley (1996). The Origins of Virtue. Matt Ridley (1999). Genome: The Autobiography of a Species in 23 Chapters. Matt Ridley (2003). Nature Via Nurture: Genes, Experience, and What Makes Us Human. Reprinted as The Agile Gene: How Nature Turns on Nurture. Michael Ruse (1998).
The creation of a strong white middle-class was their goal; policymakers wanted to make sure for their children and grandchildren that they were intentional about the “nurture” aspect of their ...
Nature Via Nurture: Genes, Experience, and What Makes us Human is a 2003 book by Matt Ridley, in which Ridley discusses the interaction between environment and genes and how they affect human development.
The slow-motion footage in “Every Little Thing” of hummingbirds captured in flight, or beak deep in a flowering bud or hovering at 50 beats per second are awe-nudging. Director Sally Aitken ...
Historically, interactionism has presented a limited view of the manner in which behavioral traits develop, and has simply demonstrated that "nature" and "nurture" are both necessary. [3] Among the first biologists to propose an interactionist theory of development was Daniel Lehrman . [ 4 ]