Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Only when the whole in some way exceeds the sum of its parts is a combination of old elements patentable. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. 339 U.S. 605: 1950: Introduced the doctrine of equivalents. Kerotest Mfg. Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Eqpt. Co. 342 U.S. 180: 1952: Besser Mfg. v. United States: 343 U.S. 444: 1952
MARPA's members include many air carriers from around the world. MARPA has an air carrier committee that remains quite active. [4] The committee was originally formed by MARPA Director Josh Abelson, and since then has been chaired by Cori Ferguson of Alaska Airlines (2006–2008), David Linebaugh of Delta Air Lines (2008–2011), Steve Jones of American Airlines (2011–2013), William Barrett ...
3.5" Floppy disk drive by Alps Electric with FRU number A field-replaceable unit (FRU) [1] is a printed circuit board, part, or assembly that can be quickly and easily removed from a computer or other piece of electronic equipment, and replaced by the user or a technician without having to send the entire product or system to a repair facility.
Bauer & Cie. v. O'Donnell, 229 U.S. 1 (1913), was a 1913 United States Supreme Court decision involving whether a purchaser of a patented product bearing a price-fixing notice incurs guilt of patent infringement by reselling the product at a price lower than that which the notice commands.
Tsvi Hirsh, Tzvi Hirsh, Zebi Hirsh, Zvi Hirsh, etc. (Yiddish: צבי-הירש) is a bilingual pleonasmic Jewish name doublet, literally "deer-deer", traceable back to the Hebrew word צבי tsvi "deer" and the Middle High German word hirz "deer". [1]: 138 Notable people with the name include:
Hotchkiss v. Greenwood, 52 U.S. (11 How.) 248 (1851), was a United States Supreme Court decision credited with introducing into United States patent law the concept of non-obviousness as a patentability requirement, [1] as well as stating the applicable legal standard for determining its presence or absence in a claimed invention.
Flint v. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U.S. 107 (1911), was a United States Supreme Court case in which a taxpayer challenged the validity of a federal income tax on corporations. [1]
A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 (1935), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated regulations of the poultry industry according to the nondelegation doctrine and as an invalid use of Congress' power under the Commerce Clause. [1]