Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Lhasa Tibetan is typologically an ergative–absolutive language. Nouns are generally unmarked for grammatical number, but are marked for case. Adjectives are never marked and appear after the noun. Demonstratives also come after the noun but these are marked for number. Verbs are possibly the most complicated part of Tibetan grammar in terms ...
Heinrich August Jäschke of the Moravian mission which was established in Ladakh in 1857, [8] Tibetan Grammar and A Tibetan–English Dictionary. At St Petersburg, Isaac Jacob Schmidt published his Grammatik der tibetischen Sprache in 1839 and his Tibetisch-deutsches Wörterbuch in 1841. His access to Mongolian sources had enabled him to enrich ...
An Introduction to the Grammar of the Tibetan Language. Reprinted by Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass. Jacques, Guillaume 2012. A new transcription system for Old and Classical Tibetan Archived 2017-08-09 at the Wayback Machine, Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area, 35.3:89-96. Jäschke, Heinrich August. (1989). Tibetan Grammar. Corrected by Sunil ...
"Notes on the Lhasa dialect of the early ninth century". Oriens 8: 284–291. 1955d. "The significance for comparative grammar of some ablauts in the Tibetan number-system". T'oung-pao 43: 287–296. 1955e. "The Independent Status of Lhasa dialect within Central Tibetan". Orbis 4.1: 49–55. 1956. "Segmental diachronic phonology of a Ladakh ...
Modern Lhasa Tibetan grammar This page was last edited on 17 September 2024, at 02:30 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution ...
Outside of Lhasa itself, Lhasa Tibetan is spoken by approximately 200,000 exiled Tibetans who have moved from Tibet to India, Nepal and other countries. Tibetan is also spoken by groups of ethnic minorities in Tibet who have lived in close proximity to Tibetans for centuries, but nevertheless retain their own languages and cultures.
Kitamura Hajime (北村甫, 1923–2004) was a Japanese linguist who particularly focused on the Lhasa dialect of Tibetan. He published both a grammar and a dictionary of Lhasa Tibetan. He was employed at the Tokyo University of Foreign Studies at the Institute of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa. [1]
In a language like Lhasa Tibetan, egophoricity is part of its evidential system as the egophoric copula occupies the same slot as the allophoric and the evidential. This is not the case for languages such as Kathmandu Newar, where the two categories are expressed separately.