Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Eisegesis (/ ˌ aɪ s ɪ ˈ dʒ iː s ɪ s /) is the process of interpreting text in such a way as to introduce one's own presuppositions, agendas or biases. It is commonly referred to as reading into the text. [ 1 ]
Casa Grande, Arizona: KASS-ə GRAND / ˈ k æ s ə ˌ ɡ r æ n d / KASS-ə GRAN-dee / ˈ k æ s ə ˌ ɡ r æ n d i / Camp Hill, Pennsylvania: kam-PIL / k æ m ˈ p ɪ l / Canajoharie, New York: KAN-ə-jə-HAIR-ee / ˈ k æ n ə dʒ ə ˈ h ɛər i / Canyon de Chelly National Monument: Canyon de SHAY / ˈ ʃ eɪ / Castile, New York: koss-TYLE ...
An English-language Bible open to the Book of Isaiah. Exegesis (/ ˌ ɛ k s ɪ ˈ dʒ iː s ɪ s / EK-sih-JEE-sis; from the Greek ἐξήγησις, from ἐξηγεῖσθαι, "to lead out") is a critical explanation or interpretation of a text.
This is a list of dictionaries considered authoritative or complete by approximate number of total words, or headwords, included. number of words in a language. [1] [2] In compiling a dictionary, a lexicographer decides whether the evidence of use is sufficient to justify an entry in the dictionary.
Dante describes interpreting through a "four-fold method" (or "allegory of the theologians") in his epistle to Can Grande Della Scala. He says the "senses" of his work are not simple, but: Rather, it may be called "polysemous", that is, of many senses. A first sense derives from the letters themselves, and a second from the things signified by ...
La Grande Encyclopédie, inventaire raisonné des sciences, des lettres, et des arts (The Great Encyclopedia: a systematic inventory of science, letters, and the arts) is a 31-volume encyclopedia published in France from 1886 to 1902 by H. Lamirault, and later by the Société Anonyme de la Grande Encyclopédie (Grande Encyclopédie Company).
Is it just me, or should there be a certain symmetry between the two, and any discussion under "Exegesis" pertaining to a particular faith/perspective should have some parallel in the "Eisegesis" article? Just a $0.02 opinion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.78.90.0 21:29, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
The question of whether or not the Epistle is a forgery is controversial among Dante scholars. Scholars such as Henry Ansgar Kelly and Bruno Nardi [] have argued against its authenticity, whereas scholars such as Francesco Mazzoni [], Robert Hollander, and Charles Singleton have argued that the document is authentic.