Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Safe Harbor logo. Safe Harbor is a faith-based, long-term, residential, therapeutic community for girls, ages 14 through 19, who have been rescued from sex traffickers. "All six buildings are ...
Under the agreement, Safe Harbor was required to invest at least $1 million in the docks during the first 10 years of the lease. Another $100,000 would be required during each 10-year term the ...
For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us
In United States business law, a forward-looking statement or safe harbor statement is a statement that cannot sustain itself as merely a historical fact. A forward-looking statement predicts, projects, or uses future events as expectations or possibilities. These statements can often be misleading, as they can be mistaken for factual ...
A safe harbor is a provision of a statute or a regulation that specifies that certain conduct will be deemed not to violate a given rule. It is usually found in connection with a more-vague, overall standard. By contrast, " un safe harbors" describe conduct that will be deemed to violate the rule. For example, in the context of a statute that ...
Springfield, Ohio, cat-eating hoax. Springfield City Hall, one of several public buildings evacuated after bomb threats stemming from the hoax (pictured in 2007) Starting in September 2024, baseless claims spread online that Haitian immigrants were stealing and eating pets in Springfield, Ohio. The claims began with a local Facebook group post ...
While not required for safe harbor protection, the OSP can implement a counter notification process to avoid legal liability to its own customer as a result of taking down the material: [17] [18] After the notice has been complied with the OSP must take reasonable steps to promptly notify the alleged infringer of the action. [19]
Within the context of a series of decisions on the adequacy of the protection of personal data transferred to other countries, [3] the European Commission made a decision in 2000 that the United States' principles did comply with the EU Directive [4] – the so-called Safe Harbor decision. [5]