Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In 2021, the most recent data shows, there were more than 10,000 associations in the state, with over 2.4 million people living in them. This means homeowners associations, commonly referred to as ...
A homeowner association [or homeowners' association (HOA), sometimes referred to as a property owners' association (POA), common interest development (CID), or homeowner community], is a private, legally-incorporated organization that governs a housing community and sets rules for its residents. They are found principally in the United States ...
For Millennium Towers, the HOA retains the right to increase fines for window violations to $10,000 per event, if the board were to vote for it per their bylaws. A property attorney who deals with ...
The board hadn’t met in public in 4 1/2 years, meeting in secret since then, but still tried to block Fernandez Rundle’s office from investigating, going so far as filing a federal lawsuit ...
Vexatious litigation is legal action which is brought solely to harass or subdue an adversary. It may take the form of a primary frivolous lawsuit or may be the repetitive, burdensome, and unwarranted filing of meritless motions in a matter which is otherwise a meritorious cause of action. Filing vexatious litigation is considered an abuse of ...
Between 1990 and 2001, these two programs have resulted in over one thousand housing discrimination lawsuits and over $155 million in financial recovery. [21] However, the lawsuits and financial recoveries generated from fair housing discrimination cases only scratches the surface of all instances of discrimination.
The HOA’s efforts to stonewall the investigation are still continuing — recently, the board filed a federal lawsuit against the State Attorney’s Office to block enforcement of subpoenas ...
Mathew and Stephanie McCleary et al., v. State of Washington (short form: McCleary v. Washington), commonly known as the McCleary Decision, [1] was a lawsuit against the State of Washington. The case alleged that the state, in the body of the state legislature, had failed to meet the state constitutional duty (in Article IX, Section 1) "to make ...