Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In United States law, habeas corpus (/ ˈ h eɪ b i ə s ˈ k ɔːr p ə s /) is a recourse challenging the reasons or conditions of a person's confinement under color of law.A petition for habeas corpus is filed with a court that has jurisdiction over the custodian, and if granted, a writ is issued directing the custodian to bring the confined person before the court for examination into ...
The state Supreme Court reached a unanimous decision on April 9, 2008, that rejected the city's appeal and upheld the lower courts' decision. In October 2008, San Francisco was forced to pay a $380,000 settlement to the National Rifle Association and other plaintiffs to cover the costs of litigating Proposition H. [6]
The state legislature named the proposal the "Save Our State Amendment" and sent it to the state's ballots with the following ballot title: [4] This measure amends the State Constitution. It would change a section that deals with the courts of this state. It would make courts rely on federal and state laws when deciding cases.
South Dakota Amendment H is a proposed constitutional amendment that will appear on the ballot on November 5, 2024. If passed, the amendment would establish a top-two or nonpartisan blanket primaries for state partisan elections. [ 1 ]
The Eighth Amendment prohibits the imposition of excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishment. [77] The Supreme Court declared the death penalty unconstitutional in Furman v. Georgia (1972) under the Eighth Amendment. [78] It was later reinstated in Gregg v. Georgia. [77] Other notable cases include Malloy v.
In United States law, jurisdiction-stripping (also called court-stripping or curtailment-of-jurisdiction) is the limiting or reducing of a court's jurisdiction by Congress through its constitutional authority to determine the jurisdiction of federal courts and to exclude or remove federal cases from state courts.
The adequate and independent state ground doctrine states that when a litigant petitions the U.S. Supreme Court to review the judgment of a state court which rests upon both federal and non-federal (state) law, the U.S. Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction over the case if the state ground is (1) “adequate” to support the judgment, and ...
The Virginia Court of Appeals refused to accept the Supreme Court's decision, stating that under the Constitution, the Supreme Court did not have authority over state courts. The Virginia court held that as a matter of state sovereignty, its decisions were final and could not be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.